Literature DB >> 14618664

Patient acceptance of transvaginal sonography in the early pregnancy unit setting.

R L Dutta1, D L Economides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability of transvaginal scanning in patients attending an early pregnancy unit (EPU) due to problems in early pregnancy such as vaginal bleeding.
METHODS: An unselected group of pregnant women who were less than 8 weeks' gestation were invited to complete a questionnaire before the transvaginal scan regarding their views about the pregnancy and about the scan itself. They were asked to complete a second questionnaire after the scan had been performed. Information was collected about the presenting symptoms and the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of a total of 107 patients, the most common reason for attending the EPU was vaginal bleeding (51.4%). The primary concern for the majority of these women was their pregnancy, rather than the scan procedure itself. Their concerns about the scan were not altered by a previous history of miscarriages or by maternal age. After the scan, more than 77% of patients scored < or = 3 out of 10 with regard to discomfort, pain and embarrassment. Only 1.9% experienced marked discomfort, scoring > 8 out of 10. The scores were not altered by the patients' diagnoses. A total of 99% of patients said that they would agree to have a similar procedure in the future.
CONCLUSION: This questionnaire-based study confirms that patients attending with problems in early pregnancy find transvaginal sonography acceptable. Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618664     DOI: 10.1002/uog.892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

1.  Reasons Why Pregnant Women Participate in Ultrasound Research Involving Transvaginal Scans.

Authors:  Barbara T Meagher; Marissa R Campos; Patrick Thornton; Carrie Klima; Tara A Peters; Josefin Hallberg; Emma Ulfhager; William D O'Brien; Barbara L McFarlin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Dangers in the dark: Calling for a safer practice of transvaginal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Kelly Collins; Tina Hamlyn; George Bruxner; Alka Kothari
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-12-05

3.  Transvaginal ultrasonography: a survey of the acceptability and its predictors among a native African women population.

Authors:  Omolola M Atalabi; Imran O Morhason-Bello; Ademola J Adekanmi; Anthony O Marinho; Babatunde O Adedokun; Adegoke O Kalejaiye; Kayode Sogo; Sikiru A Gbadamosi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-12-29

4.  Does point-of-care ultrasonography cause discomfort in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms?

Authors:  Christian B Laursen; Erik Sloth; Annmarie Touborg Lassen; Jesper Rømhild Davidsen; Jess Lambrechtsen; Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen; Poul Henning Madsen; Finn Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Transvaginal Sonography: perception and attitude of Nigerian women.

Authors:  Mark C Okeji; Kennedy K Agwuna; Chika N Ihudiebube-Splendor; Iliyasu Y Izge; Kelechi K Ekuma; Jennifer O Emeter
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Intimate patient examinations: The awareness, acceptance and practice preference of transvaginal ultrasound scan among women in a South-southern State of Nigeria.

Authors:  Akintunde O Akintomide; Uzoma O Obasi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.