Literature DB >> 14618608

Dose-response relationship in tobacco-related cancers of bladder and lung: a biochemical interpretation.

Paolo Vineis1, Michael Alavanja, Seymour Garte.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2004        PMID： 14618608     DOI： 10.1002/ijc.11467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN： 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Environmental tobacco smoke in relation to bladder cancer risk--the Shanghai bladder cancer study [corrected].

Authors:  Li Tao; Yong-Bing Xiang; Renwei Wang; Heather H Nelson; Yu-Tang Gao; Kenneth K Chan; Mimi C Yu; Jian-Min Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Association of secondhand smoke exposures with DNA methylation in bladder carcinomas.

Authors:  Charlotte S Wilhelm-Benartzi; Brock C Christensen; Devin C Koestler; E Andres Houseman; Alan R Schned; Margaret R Karagas; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  N-acetyltransferase 2 genetic polymorphism: effects of carcinogen and haplotype on urinary bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  D W Hein
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and environmental tobacco smoke inhibit lung glutathione adaptive responses and increase oxidative stress.

Authors:  Chirag Kariya; Hong Wei Chu; Jie Huang; Heather Leitner; Richard J Martin; Brian J Day
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Cigarette smoking and risk of lung cancer in Korean men: the Seoul Male Cancer Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae; Moo-Song Lee; Myung-Hee Shin; Dong-Hyun Kim; Zhong-Min Li; Yoon-Ok Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  The impact of new research technologies on our understanding of environmental causes of disease: the concept of clinical vulnerability.

Authors:  Paolo Vineis; Aneire E Khan; Jelle Vlaanderen; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 7.  Modifiable risk factors for the prevention of bladder cancer: a systematic review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen H Al-Zalabani; Kelly F J Stewart; Anke Wesselius; Annemie M W J Schols; Maurice P Zeegers
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 8.082
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.