Literature DB >> 14618533

Optimization, conflict, and nonoverlapping foraging ranges in ants.

Frederick R Adler1, Deborah M Gordon.   

Abstract

An organism's foraging range depends on the behavior of neighbors, the dynamics of resources, and the availability of information. We use a well-studied population of the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus to develop and independently parameterize models that include these three factors. The models solve for an allocation of foraging ants in the area around the nest in response to other colonies. We compare formulations that optimize at the colony or individual level and those that do or do not include costs of conflict. Model predictions were compared with data collected on ant time budgets and ant density. The strategy that optimizes at the colony level but neglects costs of conflict predicts unrealistic levels of overlap. In contrast, the strategy that optimizes at the individual level predicts realistic foraging ranges with or without inclusion of conflict costs. Both the individual model and the colony model that includes conflict costs show good quantitative agreement with data. Thus, an optimal foraging response to a combination of exploitation and interference competition can largely explain how individual foraging behavior creates the foraging range of a colony. Deviations between model predictions and data indicate that colonies might allocate a larger than optimal number of foragers to areas near boundaries between foraging ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618533     DOI: 10.1086/378856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  16 in total

1.  Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Adam Guetz; Michael J Greene; Susan Holmes
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Roots in space: a spatially explicit model for below-ground competition in plants.

Authors:  Erin E O'Brien; Joel S Brown; Jason D Moll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A differential game theoretical analysis of mechanistic models for territoriality.

Authors:  Frédéric M Hamelin; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 4.  What do territory owners defend against?

Authors:  Martin Hinsch; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A simple threshold rule is sufficient to explain sophisticated collective decision-making.

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Nigel R Franks; Samuel Ellis; Saki Okuda; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The organization of foraging in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta.

Authors:  Walter R Tschinkel
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Ant Abundance along a Productivity Gradient: Addressing Two Conflicting Hypotheses.

Authors:  Udi Segev; Jaime Kigel; Yael Lubin; Katja Tielbörger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Harvester ant colony variation in foraging activity and response to humidity.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Katherine N Dektar; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interactions with combined chemical cues inform harvester ant foragers' decisions to leave the nest in search of food.

Authors:  Michael J Greene; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.