Literature DB >> 14618047

Rate-control versus conversion strategy in postoperative atrial fibrillation: trial design and pilot study results.

John K Lee1, George J Klein, Andrew D Krahn, Raymond Yee, Kelly Zarnke, Christopher Simpson, Allan Skanes.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a frequent complication of cardiac surgery. The optimal treatment strategy has not been established. Retrospective studies have suggested that a primary rate-control strategy may be equivalent to a strategy that restores sinus rhythm. Fifty patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to a strategy of antiarrhythmic therapy +/- electrical cardioversion or ventricular rate control. Anticoagulation with heparin overlapped with coumadin was administered to both arms. The primary endpoint of the study was time to conversion to sinus rhythm analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The effects of strategy on hospital length of stay was examined as well as the incidence of recurrent AF. This study demonstrated no significant difference between an antiarrhythmic conversion strategy (n = 27) and a rate-control strategy (n = 23) in time to conversion to sinus rhythm (11.2 +/- 3.2 vs. 11.8 +/- 3.9 hours; p = 0.8). With Cox multivariate analysis to control for the effects of age, sex, beta-blocker usage, and type of surgery, the conversion strategy showed a trend toward reducing the time from treatment to restoration of sinus rhythm (p = 0.08). The length of hospital stay was reduced in the antiarrhythmic arm compared with the rate-control strategy (9.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 13.2 +/- 2.0 days; p = 0.05). In hospital relapse rates in the antiarrhythmic arm were 30% compared with 57% in the rate-control strategy (p = 0.24). At the termination of the study, 91% of the patients in the rate-control arm were in sinus rhythm compared with 96% in the antiarrhythmic arm. In conclusion, this pilot study shows little difference between a rate-control strategy and a strategy to restore/maintain sinus rhythm. Regardless of the strategy, majority of patients will be in sinus rhythm after two months. A larger randomized, controlled study is needed to assess the impact of restoration of sinus rhythm on length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618047     DOI: 10.1023/a:1027428003609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Rev        ISSN: 1385-2264


  9 in total

1.  Management of postoperative atrial fibrillation and subsequent outcomes in contemporary patients undergoing cardiac surgery: insights from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons CAPS-Care Atrial Fibrillation Registry.

Authors:  Benjamin A Steinberg; Yue Zhao; Xia He; Adrian F Hernandez; David A Fullerton; Kevin L Thomas; Roger Mills; Winslow Klaskala; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Should rhythm control be preferred in younger atrial fibrillation patients?

Authors:  Shaojie Chen; Yuehui Yin; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Rate Control versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  A Marc Gillinov; Emilia Bagiella; Alan J Moskowitz; Jesse M Raiten; Mark A Groh; Michael E Bowdish; Gorav Ailawadi; Katherine A Kirkwood; Louis P Perrault; Michael K Parides; Robert L Smith; John A Kern; Gladys Dussault; Amy E Hackmann; Neal O Jeffries; Marissa A Miller; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Eric A Rose; Richard D Weisel; Deborah L Williams; Ralph F Mangusan; Michael Argenziano; Ellen G Moquete; Karen L O'Sullivan; Michel Pellerin; Kinjal J Shah; James S Gammie; Mary Lou Mayer; Pierre Voisine; Annetine C Gelijns; Patrick T O'Gara; Michael J Mack
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Atrial fibrillation post cardiac bypass surgery.

Authors:  Ashraf Mostafa; Mohamed A El-Haddad; Maithili Shenoy; Tushar Tuliani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2012-07

5.  Atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery trends toward management.

Authors:  Awad A R Alqahtani
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2010-06

Review 6.  Clinical review: treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in medical intensive care patients--a clinical framework.

Authors:  Mengalvio E Sleeswijk; Trudeke Van Noord; Jaap E Tulleken; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Armand R J Girbes; Jan G Zijlstra
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  De novo atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery: the Durban experience.

Authors:  Ebrahim Mansoor
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.167

Review 8.  Management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Puneet Kakar; Christopher J Boos; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007

Review 9.  The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Naqash J Sethi; Joshua Feinberg; Emil E Nielsen; Sanam Safi; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.