Literature DB >> 14616724

Evaluation of the ProSpecT Microplate Assay for detection of Campylobacter: a routine laboratory perspective.

A Dediste1, O Vandenberg, L Vlaes, A Ebraert, N Douat, P Bahwere, J-P Butzler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of the new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the ProSpecT Campylobacter Microplate Assay (Alexon-Trend, Minneapolis, MN, USA), which allows 2-h detection of both Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli antigen directly in stool specimens.
METHODS: Over 4 months, all stool samples preserved in Cary-Blair medium, or fresh specimens, from non-hospitalized children and HIV-infected patients (adults and children), submitted to our laboratory were evaluated with the ProSpecT Campylobacter Microplate Assay. Results were compared with those obtained by routine culture methods using both a specific medium and a filtration method for the recovery of Campylobacter spp.
RESULTS: Of the 1205 stool specimens cultured, 101 were found to be positive for either C. jejuni or C. coli, giving an overall recovery rate of 8.38%. Ninety samples were positive by both culture and ProSpecT Campylobacter Microplate Assay, and 11 were positive by culture only, giving a sensitivity of 89.1%. In addition, of 1104 samples negative by culture, 25 were initially positive by ProSpecT Campylobacter Microplate Assay. We found no cross-reaction with other bacterial enteropathogens isolated from stool specimens. These results thus confirm a high specificity (97.7%) for both C. jejuni and C. coli. The positive and negative predictive values found were 78.3% and 99%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity if the stool was fresh or preserved with Cary-Blair medium.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the ProSpecT Campylobacter Microplate Assay is a rapid and easy-to-use test for the detection of both C. jejuni and C. coli in stool specimens. It could be used for patients for whom early antibiotic therapy is needed or for epidemiologic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616724     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00705.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  15 in total

1.  Detection of Campylobacter in stool and determination of significance by culture, enzyme immunoassay, and PCR in developing countries.

Authors:  James A Platts-Mills; Jie Liu; Jean Gratz; Esto Mduma; Caroline Amour; Ndealilia Swai; Mami Taniuchi; Sharmin Begum; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Drake H Tilley; Gwenyth Lee; Zeli Shen; Mark T Whary; James G Fox; Monica McGrath; Margaret Kosek; Rashidul Haque; Eric R Houpt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Andrea J Linscott
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Detection of non-jejuni and -coli Campylobacter species from stool specimens with an immunochromatographic antigen detection assay.

Authors:  Brianne A Couturier; Marc Roger Couturier; Kim J Kalp; Mark A Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  New methods for detection of campylobacters in stool samples in comparison to culture.

Authors:  Emilie Bessède; Adline Delcamp; Elodie Sifré; Alice Buissonnière; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  The Point-of-Care Laboratory in Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Michel Drancourt; Audrey Michel-Lepage; Sylvie Boyer; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Revisiting the Roles of Culture and Culture-Independent Detection Tests for Campylobacter.

Authors:  Marc Roger Couturier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of premier CAMPY enzyme immunoassay (EIA), ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA, and ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY tests with culture for laboratory diagnosis of Campylobacter enteric infections.

Authors:  Paul A Granato; Li Chen; Iris Holiday; Russell A Rawling; Susan M Novak-Weekley; Tammy Quinlan; Kimberlee A Musser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in children from communities in Northeastern Brazil: molecular detection and relation to nutritional status.

Authors:  Josiane da Silva Quetz; Ila Fernanda Nunes Lima; Alexandre Havt; Eunice Bobo de Carvalho; Noélia Leal Lima; Alberto Melo Soares; Rosa Maria Salani Mota; Richard Littleton Guerrant; Aldo Angelo Moreira Lima
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Improved detection of five major gastrointestinal pathogens by use of a molecular screening approach.

Authors:  Richard F de Boer; Alewijn Ott; Barbara Kesztyüs; Anna M D Kooistra-Smid
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Diagnostic approach to acute diarrheal illness in a military population on training exercises in Thailand, a region of campylobacter hyperendemicity.

Authors:  David R Tribble; Shahida Baqar; Lorrin W Pang; Carl Mason; Huo-Shu H Houng; Chittima Pitarangsi; Carlos Lebron; Adam Armstrong; Orntipa Sethabutr; John W Sanders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.