Literature DB >> 14616674

A study of recurrence of retraction pockets after various methods of primary reconstruction of attic and mesotympanic defects in combined approach tympanoplasty.

A G Pfleiderer1, S Ghosh, N Kairinos, F Chaudhri.   

Abstract

The major drawback of combined approach tympanoplasty (CAT) is a relatively high rate of cholesteatoma recurrence compared to open-cavity techniques, which is thought to occur primarily by recurrence of retraction pockets. In this series of 63 CATs carried out by one surgeon, scutum reconstruction to prevent recurrent attic retraction was carried out in 43 cases. Repair with bone pate proved much more successful in achieving this (20.7%; 6/29 recurrent retraction pockets) compared to tragal cartilage (57.1%; 8/14) (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0205) and was found to be a result of the greater incidence of cartilage resorption. Recurrence of retraction in pars tensa defects was more common as the only material used was a simple temporalis fascia graft. The mean time to development of recurrences was 21.1 months and that has important implications for follow-up. We conclude that the use of bone pate for scutum reconstructions reduces the incidence of attic retraction pockets, and therefore the risk of cholesteatoma recurrence following CAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616674     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00766.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  5 in total

1.  Reconstruction of outer attic wall defects using bone paté: Long-term clinical and histological evaluation.

Authors:  Andrea Bacciu; Enrico Pasanisi; Vincenzo Vincenti; Filippo Di Lella; Salvatore Bacciu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Tympanic membrane retraction pocket staging: is it worthwhile?

Authors:  Musaed Alzahrani; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction versus intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy for cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension.

Authors:  Masaomi Motegi; Yutaka Yamamoto; Taisuke Akutsu; Takahiro Nakajima; Masahiro Takahashi; Sayaka Sampei; Kazuhisa Yamamoto; Tomokatsu Udagawa; Yuika Sakurai; Hiromi Kojima
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Epitympanoplasty with cartilage obliteration in the preservation of posterior canal wall: a technique for surgical treatment of attic cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jianjun Sun; Danheng Zhao; Yongsheng Lin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Osteoplastic atticoantrotomy with autologous bone chips and a bony attic strut in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Eckard Gehrking
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.503

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.