Literature DB >> 14616416

No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between voriconazole and indinavir in healthy volunteers.

Lynn Purkins1, Nolan Wood, Diane Kleinermans, Edward R Love.   

Abstract

AIMS: Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent, and is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4. Protease inhibitors, such as indinavir, are also metabolized by cytochrome P450 (mainly CYP3A4). As these drugs are likely to be coadministered, these studies were performed to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions, safety and toleration of these drugs when taken together.
METHODS: Two randomized placebo-controlled studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers. Study A was an open parallel-group study of the effect of indinavir on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in 18 volunteers (nine subjects in each group). Subjects received voriconazole 200 mg twice daily (days 1-7), then voriconazole 200 mg twice daily + indinavir 800 mg or placebo three times daily (days 8-17). Study B was a double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study of the effect of voriconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir in 14 volunteers. They received indinavir 800 mg three times daily + voriconazole 200 mg or placebo twice daily for two 7-day treatment periods separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared within treatment groups at days 7 and 17 in Study A and between treatment groups on day 7 of each period in Study B. All adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS: Study A: Seventeen subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis (eight voriconazole + indinavir, nine voriconazole + placebo). The day 17/day 7 ratios for Cmax and AUCtau were estimated as 102%[90% confidence interval (CI) 91, 114] and 107% (90% CI 98, 118), respectively. Study B: Fourteen subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis in each treatment period. The ratios between the geometric means for indinavir + voriconazole vs. indinavir + placebo were: Cmax, 91% (90% CI 83, 101), AUCtau, 87% (90% CI 77, 100), and Cmin, 101% (90% CI 82, 125). Trough plasma concentrations of indinavir were above the concentration required to inhibit HIV replication (IC95) in both treatment periods. Voriconazole coadministered with indinavir was well tolerated in both studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of voriconazole and indinavir in healthy volunteers had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of either voriconazole or indinavir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616416      PMCID: PMC1884318          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  13 in total

1.  The influence of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of a twice-daily combination of indinavir and low-dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Rob E Aarnoutse; Karin J T Grintjes; Denise S C Telgt; Michael Stek; Patricia W H Hugen; Peter Reiss; Peter P Koopmans; Yechiel A Hekster; David M Burger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  D J Back; S H Khoo; S E Gibbons; C Merry
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Differential inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoforms by the protease inhibitors, ritonavir, saquinavir and indinavir.

Authors:  V A Eagling; D J Back; M G Barry
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Determination of a new antifungal agent, voriconazole, by multidimensional high-performance liquid chromatography with direct plasma injection onto a size-exclusion column.

Authors:  D A Stopher; R Gage
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  1997-04-11

5.  In vitro activity of the new triazole voriconazole (UK-109,496) against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and common and emerging yeast pathogens.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Guidelines for using antiretroviral agents among HIV-infected adults and adolescents. Recommendations of the Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV.

Authors:  Mark Dybul; Anthony S Fauci; John G Bartlett; Jonathan E Kaplan; Alice K Pau
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-05-17

7.  Effect of fluconazole on indinavir pharmacokinetics in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Authors:  S De Wit; M Debier; M De Smet; J McCrea; J Stone; A Carides; C Matthews; P Deutsch; N Clumeck
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Current and emerging azole antifungal agents.

Authors:  D J Sheehan; C A Hitchcock; C M Sibley
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Comparison of the in-vitro activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496), itraconazole and amphotericin B against clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  M Cuenca-Estrella; J L Rodríguez-Tudela; E Mellado; J V Martínez-Suárez; A Monzón
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  The search for new triazole antifungal agents.

Authors:  Y Koltin; C A Hitchcock
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lack of indinavir effects on methadone disposition despite inhibition of hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A).

Authors:  Evan D Kharasch; Pamela Sheffels Bedynek; Christine Hoffer; Alysa Walker; Dale Whittington
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Steady-state pharmacokinetics of micafungin and voriconazole after separate and concomitant dosing in healthy adults.

Authors:  J Keirns; T Sawamoto; M Holum; D Buell; W Wisemandle; A Alak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions.

Authors:  Abdo Haddad; Mellar Davis; Ruth Lagman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Role of flavin-containing monooxygenase in oxidative metabolism of voriconazole by human liver microsomes.

Authors:  Souzan B Yanni; Pieter P Annaert; Patrick Augustijns; Arlene Bridges; Yan Gao; Daniel K Benjamin; Dhiren R Thakker
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Voriconazole Integrating Time-Dependent Inhibition of CYP3A4, Genetic Polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and Predictions of Drug-Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Xia Li; Sebastian Frechen; Daniel Moj; Thorsten Lehr; Max Taubert; Chih-Hsuan Hsin; Gerd Mikus; Pertti J Neuvonen; Klaus T Olkkola; Teijo I Saari; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.