Literature DB >> 14616373

Diagnostic and neural analysis of skin cancer (DANAOS). A multicentre study for collection and computer-aided analysis of data from pigmented skin lesions using digital dermoscopy.

K Hoffmann1, T Gambichler, A Rick, M Kreutz, M Anschuetz, T Grünendick, A Orlikov, S Gehlen, R Perotti, L Andreassi, J Newton Bishop, J-P Césarini, T Fischer, P J Frosch, R Lindskov, R Mackie, D Nashan, A Sommer, M Neumann, J P Ortonne, P Bahadoran, P F Penas, U Zoras, P Altmeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of melanomas by means of diverse screening campaigns is an important step towards a reduction in mortality. Computer-aided analysis of digital images obtained by dermoscopy has been reported to be an accurate, practical and time-saving tool for the evaluation of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs). A prototype for the computer-aided diagnosis of PSLs using artificial neural networks (NNs) has recently been developed: diagnostic and neural analysis of skin cancer (DANAOS).
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the accuracy of PSL diagnosis by the DANAOS expert system, a multicentre study on a diverse multinational population was conducted.
METHODS: A calibrated camera system was developed and used to collect images of PSLs in a multicentre study in 13 dermatology centres in nine European countries. The dataset was used to train an NN expert system for the computer-aided diagnosis of melanoma. We analysed different aspects of the data collection and its influence on the performance of the expert system. The NN expert system was trained with a dataset of 2218 dermoscopic images of PSLs.
RESULTS: The resulting expert system showed a performance similar to that of dermatologists as published in the literature. The performance depended on the size and quality of the database and its selection.
CONCLUSIONS: The need for a large database, the usefulness of multicentre data collection, as well as the benefit of a representative collection of cases from clinical practice, were demonstrated in this trial. Images that were difficult to classify using the NN expert system were not identical to those found difficult to classify by clinicians. We suggest therefore that the combination of clinician and computer may potentially increase the accuracy of PSL diagnosis. This may result in improved detection of melanoma and a reduction in unnecessary excisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616373     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05547.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  17 in total

1.  A methodological approach to the classification of dermoscopy images.

Authors:  M Emre Celebi; Hassan A Kingravi; Bakhtiyar Uddin; Hitoshi Iyatomi; Y Alp Aslandogan; William V Stoecker; Randy H Moss
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 2.  Distribution quantification on dermoscopy images for computer-assisted diagnosis of cutaneous melanomas.

Authors:  Zhao Liu; Jiuai Sun; Lyndon Smith; Melvyn Smith; Robert Warr
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Current and emerging technologies in melanoma diagnosis: the state of the art.

Authors:  Estee L Psaty; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

4.  Skin cancer recognition by using a neuro-fuzzy system.

Authors:  Bareqa Salah; Mohammad Alshraideh; Rasha Beidas; Ferial Hayajneh
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2011-02-02

5.  Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

7.  Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Jacqueline Dinnes; Naomi Chuchu; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Rubeta N Matin; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan O'Connell; Matthew D Gardiner; Jeffrey Bamber; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

8.  Computer-aided dermoscopy for diagnosis of melanoma.

Authors:  Masoomeh Barzegari; Haiedeh Ghaninezhad; Parisa Mansoori; Arash Taheri; Zahra S Naraghi; Masood Asgari
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2005-07-06

9.  The feasibility of using manual segmentation in a multifeature computer-aided diagnosis system for classification of skin lesions: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Chang; Adam Huang; Yin-Chun Chen; Chi-Wei Lin; John Tsai; Chung-Kai Yang; Yin-Tseng Huang; Yi-Fan Wu; Gwo-Shing Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Lacunarity analysis: a promising method for the automated assessment of melanocytic naevi and melanoma.

Authors:  Stephen Gilmore; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Jim Muir; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.