AIM: Non-invasive tests for the assessment of Helicobacter pylori status are now an integral part of the management strategies for patients with dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to evaluate a urine based antibody ELISA and a near patient urine test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in a European population. METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 449 patients (240 females, 209 males, mean age 54 years), with dyspeptic symptoms but no previous H. pylori eradication therapy, at five centres in four European countries. All patients underwent GI endoscopy and biopsies were taken for H. pylori diagnosis. Urine samples were analysed using an IgG ELISA (URINELISA) and a near patient urine test (RAPIRUN). In addition, a serum IgG ELISA (Pyloriset-EIA-GIII), a whole blood test (Pyloriset-Screen) and a 13C-urea breath test were performed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the urine based ELISA and the near patient urine test was 90% and 82%, and the specificity 68% and 83%, respectively. The accuracy of the serum ELISA and the whole blood test was comparable with the urine based test. CONCLUSION: The urine based ELISA and the near patient urine test are just as accurate as the serological tests. This comparable accuracy and complete non-invasiveness of the former gives it an advantage over blood based tests. This limits the application of these tests in general practice.
AIM: Non-invasive tests for the assessment of Helicobacter pylori status are now an integral part of the management strategies for patients with dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to evaluate a urine based antibody ELISA and a near patient urine test for the diagnosis of H. pyloriinfection in a European population. METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 449 patients (240 females, 209 males, mean age 54 years), with dyspeptic symptoms but no previous H. pylori eradication therapy, at five centres in four European countries. All patients underwent GI endoscopy and biopsies were taken for H. pylori diagnosis. Urine samples were analysed using an IgG ELISA (URINELISA) and a near patient urine test (RAPIRUN). In addition, a serum IgG ELISA (Pyloriset-EIA-GIII), a whole blood test (Pyloriset-Screen) and a 13C-urea breath test were performed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the urine based ELISA and the near patient urine test was 90% and 82%, and the specificity 68% and 83%, respectively. The accuracy of the serum ELISA and the whole blood test was comparable with the urine based test. CONCLUSION: The urine based ELISA and the near patient urine test are just as accurate as the serological tests. This comparable accuracy and complete non-invasiveness of the former gives it an advantage over blood based tests. This limits the application of these tests in general practice.
Authors: May A Beydoun; Hind A Beydoun; Monal R Shroff; Melissa H Kitner-Triolo; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: May A Beydoun; Hind A Beydoun; Martine Elbejjani; Gregory A Dore; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 21.566