Literature DB >> 14615342

Booking patients for hospital admissions: evaluation of a pilot programme for day cases.

Hugh McLeod1, Chris Ham, Ruth Kipping.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: NHS patients requiring elective surgery usually have to wait before being treated and are usually told when a date becomes available.
DESIGN: 18 month pilot programme to enable day case patients to book date of hospital admission at time of decision to operate. BACKGROUND AND
SETTING: 24 pilot sites in England with relatively short waiting times and some experience of booking appointments. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Proportion of patients with booked or "to come in" date during and after pilot programme, proportion not attending for admission, and proportion waiting > or = 6 months. Comparison of pilot sites with non-pilot sites. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: National Patients' Access Team established to help pilot sites enable patients to book admission dates. Provision of 9.9m pounds sterling to pilot sites to employ project managers, purchase equipment, buy extra time from clinical and other staff, and invest in information and communications technology. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Proportion of patients with booked or "to come in" date increased from 51.1% to 72.7% between end of March 1999 and end of March 2000, and then fell to 66.2% by end of March 2001. Over the same periods, the proportion of patients waiting > or = 6 months fell from 10.9% to 10.5% and then increased to 11.9%. The proportion of patients failing to attend fell from 5.7% to 3.1% between the first quarter of 1999 and the first quarter of 2000, and then increased to 4.0% in the first quarter of 2001. Pilot sites varied widely in performance during and after the pilot phase. Pilot sites had higher proportions of patients with booked or "to come in" date than non-pilot sites at end of each period. LESSONS LEARNT: Increasing the proportion of patients who book their date of hospital admission is possible, but there are difficulties in sustaining this. Several factors facilitated or hindered the implementation of booking, and the roll out of the programme across the NHS is seeking to incorporate these factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14615342      PMCID: PMC261817          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  Analysis of data arising from a stratified design with the cluster as unit of randomization.

Authors:  A Donner; A Donald
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Admissions by the book.

Authors:  A G Cox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Wait time management strategies for scheduled care: what makes them succeed?

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Pomey; Pierre-Gerlier Forest; Claudia Sanmartin; Carolyn De Coster; Madeleine Drew
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-02

2.  Evaluation of booking systems for elective surgery using simulation experiments.

Authors:  Boris G Sobolev; Victor Sanchez; Lisa Kuramoto; Adrian R Levy; Martin Schechter; J Mark Fitzgerald
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-05

3.  Using the Statecharts paradigm for simulation of patient flow in surgical care.

Authors:  Boris Sobolev; David Harel; Christos Vasilakis; Adrian Levy
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-03

Review 4.  Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Pomey; Pierre-Gerlier Forest; Claudia Sanmartin; Carolyn Decoster; Nathalie Clavel; Elaine Warren; Madeleine Drew; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Communication With Patients Before an Operation: Their Preferences on Method of Communication.

Authors:  Abdallah Al Ghunimat; Jamie Hind; Amr Abouelela; Gur Aziz Singh Sidhu; Andrew Lacon; Neil Ashwood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.