Literature DB >> 14615341

Screening for depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study.

Bruce Arroll1, Natalie Khin, Ngaire Kerse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of two verbally asked questions for screening for depression.
DESIGN: Cross sectional criterion standard validation study.
SETTING: 15 general practices in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 421 consecutive patients not taking psychotropic drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the two questions compared with the computerised composite international diagnostic interview.
RESULTS: The two screening questions showed a sensitivity and specificity of 97% (95% confidence interval, 83% to 99%) and 67% (62% to 72%), respectively. The likelihood ratio for a positive test was 2.9 (2.5 to 3.4) and the likelihood ratio for a negative test was 0.05 (0.01 to 0.35). Overall, 37% (157/421) of the patients screened positive for depression.
CONCLUSION: Two verbally asked questions for screening for depression would detect most cases of depression in general practice. The questions have the advantage of brevity. As treatment is more likely when doctors make the diagnosis, these questions may have even greater utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14615341      PMCID: PMC261815          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  15 in total

1.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Depression screening: a practical strategy.

Authors:  Donald E Nease; Jean M Maloin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael P Pignone; Bradley N Gaynes; Jerry L Rushton; Catherine Mills Burchell; C Tracy Orleans; Cynthia D Mulrow; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

6.  Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J B Williams; K Kroenke; M Linzer; F V deGruy; S R Hahn; D Brody; J G Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

8.  The recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of mental disorders by primary care physicians.

Authors:  S M Andersen; B H Harthorn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Epidemiology of depression in primary care.

Authors:  W Katon; H Schulberg
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.238

10.  A comparison of two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN.

Authors:  G Andrews; L Peters; A M Guzman; K Bird
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.744

View more
  115 in total

1.  How many conditions can a GP screen for?

Authors:  Chris Del Mar; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-15

Review 2.  What is the role of general practice in addressing youth mental health? A discussion paper.

Authors:  W Cullen; N Broderick; D Connolly; D Meagher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Problematic pain - redefining how we view pain?

Authors:  Chris Barker; Ann Taylor; Martin Johnson
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2014-02

4.  Do ultra-short screening instruments accurately detect depression in primary care? A pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; James C Coyne
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  [Is the orthodox approach to depression in primary care valid?].

Authors:  B Pérez-Franco; J L Turabián-Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Suicidal behavior among homeless people in Japan.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Okamura; Kae Ito; Suimei Morikawa; Shuichi Awata
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Intendedness of pregnancy and other predictive factors for symptoms of prenatal depression in a population-based study.

Authors:  Jena L Fellenzer; Donald A Cibula
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

8.  Association of depression and antidepressant use with mortality in a large cohort of patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD.

Authors:  Rasheed A Balogun; Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Seki A Balogun; Evan H Lott; Jun Ling Lu; Sandra M Malakauskas; Jennie Z Ma; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Systematic care for caregivers of people with dementia in the ambulatory mental health service: designing a multicentre, cluster, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Anouk Spijker; Frans Verhey; Maud Graff; Richard Grol; Eddy Adang; Hub Wollersheim; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Discussing prognosis with older people with musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study in general practice.

Authors:  Christian David Mallen; George Peat
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.