Literature DB >> 14614425

Long-term in vitro fluoride release and rerelease from orthodontic bonding materials containing fluoride.

Warren J Cohen1, William A Wiltshire, Colin Dawes, Chris L B Lavelle.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro long-term (30 month) fluoride release and rerelease rates (after fluoride exposure) from 3 orthodontic bonding materials containing fluoride and 1 without fluoride. Ten samples of each material (Python, TP Orthodontics, LaPorte, Ind; Assure, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Ill; Fuji Ortho LC, GC America, Alsip, Ill; and Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were fabricated and stored in deionized distilled water at 37 degrees C. Five samples had fluoride-release rates measured at days 546, 637, 730, 821, and 913 after initial fabrication, and 5 samples were exposed to fluoride (Nupro 2% NaF gel, Dentsply Canada, Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada) for 4 minutes at day 535 and had measurements taken on days 546, 548, 552, 575, 637, 730, 821, and 913. To prevent cumulative measurements, the storage solutions were changed 24 hours before measurement. Statistically significant differences were found in fluoride-release rates (P <.0001), with Fuji Ortho LC releasing the most fluoride, followed by Python and Assure at all time points in the nonfluoride exposed group. In the fluoride-exposed group, there were significant differences in fluoride release (P <.0001), with Fuji Ortho LC releasing the most fluoride. A "burst-effect" pattern of fluoride release was seen after fluoride exposure for all materials. It was concluded that Fuji Ortho LC, Assure, and Python might have sufficient long-term fluoride-release rates to reduce white spot formation, and all are recommended as suitable fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14614425     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00573-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  Efficacy of four preventive measures against enamel demineralization at the bracket periphery-comparison of microhardness and confocal laser microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Franz-Josef Geiger; Yuriy Malyk; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Do bonding agents protect the bracket-periphery?--Evaluation by consecutive μCT scans and fluorescence measurements.

Authors:  Ekaterini Paschos; Teresa Galosi; Karin C Huth; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Carbon dioxide laser and bonding materials reduce enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Cíntia Maria de Souza-e-Silva; Thaís Manzano Parisotto; Carolina Steiner-Oliveira; Regianne Umeko Kamiya; Lidiany Karla Azevedo Rodrigues; Marinês Nobre-dos-Santos
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Release of fluoride from orthodontic adhesives and penetration into enamel.

Authors:  Panita Suebsureekul; Smorntree Viteporn
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Influence of topical fluoride application on mechanical properties of orthodontic bonding materials under pH cycling.

Authors:  Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo; Matheus Melo Pithon; Rogerio Lacerda do Santos; Nashalie Andrade de Alencar; Aline Corrêa Abrahão; Lucianne Cople Maia
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  The effect of incorporation Nano Cinnamon powder on the shear bond of the orthodontic composite (an in vitro study).

Authors:  Saba N Yaseen; Amer A Taqa; Ali R Al-Khatib
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-04-05

7.  Does the amount of filler content in sealants used to prevent decalcification on smooth enamel surfaces really matter?

Authors:  Lauren Van Bebber; Phillip M Campbell; Allen L Honeyman; Robert Spears; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Assessment of Streptococcus mutans biofilms on orthodontic adhesives over 7 days.

Authors:  Benjamin J Schneider; Rochelle D Hiers; G Frans Currier; Onur Kadioglu; Sarah E Johnston; Yan D Zhao; Fernando L Esteban Florez; Sharukh S Khajotia
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Anti-Streptococcus mutans property of a chitosan: Containing resin sealant.

Authors:  Ramazan Rajabnia; Maryam Ghasempour; Samane Gharekhani; Sepide Gholamhoseinnia; Sepide Soroorhomayoon
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

10.  Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of a conventional orthodontic composite containing silver/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ahmad Sodagar; Azam Akhavan; Ehsan Hashemi; Sepideh Arab; Maryam Pourhajibagher; Kosar Sodagar; Mohammad Javad Kharrazifard; Abbas Bahador
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.