Literature DB >> 14614416

Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements.

Karen Michelle Clements1, Anne-Marie Bollen, Greg Huang, Greg King, Philippe Hujoel, Tsun Ma.   

Abstract

Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study to explore the treatment effects of material stiffness and frequency of appliance change when using clear, sequential, removable appliances (aligners). Patients were stratified based on pretreatment peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and need for extractions. They were randomized into 4 treatment protocols: 1-week activation with soft material, 1-week activation with hard material, 2-week activation with soft material, and 2-week activation with hard material. Patients continued with their protocols until either the series of aligners was completed, or until it was determined that the aligner was not fitting well (study end point). Weighted PAR score and average incisor irregularity (AII) indexes were used to measure pretreatment and end-point study models, and average improvement was compared among the 4 groups. In addition to the evaluation of the 4 treatment groups, comparisons were made of the individual components of the PAR score to determine which occlusal components experienced the most correction with the aligners. The percentages and absolute extraction space closures were evaluated, and papillary bleeding scores before and during treatment were compared. Although no statistical difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups, a trend was noted with the 2-week frequency having a larger percentage of reduction in weighted PAR and AII scores, and greater extraction space closure. Anterior alignment was the most improved component, and buccal occlusion was the least improved. When analyzed by type of extraction, incisor extraction sites had a significantly greater percentage of closure than either maxillary or mandibular premolar extraction sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean average papillary bleeding score was found during treatment when compared with pretreatment scores, although this difference was not clinically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14614416     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00577-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  How effective is the Invisalign® system in expansion movement with Ex30' aligners?

Authors:  B Solano-Mendoza; B Sonnemberg; E Solano-Reina; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region: were the predicted tooth movements achieved?

Authors:  Elena Krieger; Jörg Seiferth; Ivana Marinello; Britta A Jung; Susanne Wriedt; Collin Jacobs; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Accuracy of Invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region. First results.

Authors:  Elena Krieger; Jörg Seiferth; Ivana Saric; Britta A Jung; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Perception of esthetic orthodontic appliances: An eye tracking and cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Moritz Försch; Lena Krull; Marlene Hechtner; Roman Rahimi; Susanne Wriedt; Heiner Wehrbein; Cornelius Jacobs; Collin Jacobs
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Jing Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Patient survey on Invisalign® treatment comparing [corrected] the SmartTrack® material to the previously used [corrected] aligner material.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Bräscher; Dietmar Zuran; Robert E Feldmann; Justus Benrath
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  A comparative study of two different clear aligner systems.

Authors:  Federica Ercoli; Michele Tepedino; Vincenzo Parziale; Cesare Luzi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Comparative Assessment of Clinical and Predicted Treatment Outcomes of Clear Aligner Treatment: An in Vivo Study.

Authors:  Arisha Izhar; Gurkeerat Singh; Varun Goyal; Rajkumar Singh; Nishant Gupta; Prerna Pahuja
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-12-01

9.  Evaluation of effectiveness and stability of aligner treatments using the Peer Assessment Rating Index.

Authors:  Isabelle Graf; Carolin Puppe; Jörg Schwarze; Karolin Höfer; Hildegard Christ; Bert Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Effect of clear aligner wear protocol on the efficacy of tooth movement.

Authors:  Mays Al-Nadawi; Neal D Kravitz; Ismaeel Hansa; Laith Makki; Donald J Ferguson; Nikhilesh R Vaid
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.