Literature DB >> 14612213

Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles.

Tzung-Dau Wang1, Wen-Jone Chen, Jong-Wei Lin, Ching-Chih Cheng, Ming-Fong Chen, Yuan-Teh Lee.   

Abstract

Given that combination therapy with statin plus fibrate confers a risk of myopathy, it is worthwhile to determine whether statin or fibrate monotherapy is associated with greater clinical benefit in individuals with combined hyperlipidemia. In this randomized double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of simvastatin and fenofibrate on indexes of endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery) and inflammatory markers (plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), soluble CD40, and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) levels), as surrogate indicators of future coronary heart disease (CHD), in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. A total of 70 patients with plasma triglyceride levels between 200 and 500 mg/dl and total cholesterol levels of >200 mg/dl were randomly assigned to receive either simvastatin (20 mg/day) (n=35) or micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day) (n=35) for 8 weeks. Treatment with simvastatin was associated with significantly greater reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), while the decrease in triglycerides was significantly greater in patients receiving fenofibrate. Both fenofibrate and simvastatin markedly reduced plasma levels of high-sensitivity CRP, IL-1 beta, and sCD40L, and improved endothelium-dependent FMD without mutual differences. The changes in plasma inflammatory markers did not correlate with baseline clinical characteristics in both groups. However, the improvement in FMD with fenofibrate treatment correlated inversely with baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, whereas the improvement in FMD with simvastatin treatment was positively related to HDL-C levels. Accordingly, in the subgroup with a baseline HDL-C of < or =40 mg/dl, only fenofibrate significantly improved the endothelium-dependent FMD. On the other hand, in the subgroup with HDL-C >40 mg/dl, only treatment with simvastatin achieved significant improvement in FMD. The data here indicate that in patients with combined hyperlipidemia, both fenofibrate and simvastatin have comparative beneficial effects on various inflammatory markers and differential beneficial effects on endothelial function according to baseline HDL-C levels. These findings should be validated by additional prospective studies, in which patients are stratified by baseline HDL-C prior to randomization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14612213     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(03)00296-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  22 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms, significance and treatment of vascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on lipid-regulating therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Woodman; Gerard T Chew; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Fenofibrate: a review of its use in primary dyslipidaemia, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Katherine F Croom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  CD40/CD40L system and vascular disease.

Authors:  F Santilli; S Basili; P Ferroni; G Davì
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Vascular and metabolic effects of treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: focus on statins and fibrates.

Authors:  Kwang Kon Koh; Michael J Quon; Robert S Rosenson; Wook-Jin Chung; Seung Hwan Han
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 5.  Beyond high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels evaluating high-density lipoprotein function as influenced by novel therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Emil M deGoma; Rolando L deGoma; Daniel J Rader
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Extended-Release Niacin Versus Fenofibrate in HIV-Infected Participants With Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Effects on Endothelial Function, Lipoproteins, and Inflammation.

Authors:  Michael P Dubé; Lauren Komarow; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Joseph J Cadden; Edgar T Overton; Howard N Hodis; Judith S Currier; James H Stein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Fenofibrate: a review of its use in dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  The PPAR-alpha activator fenofibrate fails to provide myocardial protection in ischemia and reperfusion in pigs.

Authors:  Ya Xu; Li Lu; Clifford Greyson; Mona Rizeq; Karin Nunley; Beata Wyatt; Michael R Bristow; Carlin S Long; Gregory G Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Fenofibrate and metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Aldi T Kraja; Michael A Province; Robert J Straka; Jose M Ordovas; Ingrid B Borecki; Donna K Arnett
Journal:  Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Reduction in blood pressure with statins: results from the UCSD Statin Study, a randomized trial.

Authors:  Beatrice A Golomb; Joel E Dimsdale; Halbert L White; Janis B Ritchie; Michael H Criqui
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.