Literature DB >> 1461212

Improvement in specificity of ultrasonography for diagnosis of breast tumors by means of artificial intelligence.

V Goldberg1, A Manduca, D L Ewert, J J Gisvold, J F Greenleaf.   

Abstract

A set of ultrasonograms of lesions from 200 patients between the ages of 14 and 93 years who underwent mammography followed by ultrasonographic examination and excisional biopsy has been studied with computer vision techniques to improve the ultrasonographic specificity of the diagnosis. Selected features representing the texture of the lesion were calculated and then classified by an artificial neural network. This network was biased toward correctly classifying all the malignant cases at the expense of some misclassification of the benign cases. The network diagnosed the malignant cases with 100% sensitivity and 40% specificity (compared with 0% specificity for the radiologists diagnosing the same set of cases in the breast imaging setting), and tests performed with a leave-one-out technique indicate that the network will generalize well to new cases. This suggests that methods based on neural network classification of texture features show promise for potentially decreasing the number of unnecessary biopsies by a significant amount in patients with sonographically identifiable lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461212     DOI: 10.1118/1.596804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; R F Wagner; L Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparative analysis of texture characteristics of malignant and benign tumors in breast ultrasonograms.

Authors:  K G Kim; J H Kim; B G Min
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From the Origins to Routine EUS.

Authors:  Eugene P DiMagno; Matthew J DiMagno
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  A new endoscopic ultrasonography image processing method to evaluate the prognosis for pancreatic cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yan Liu; Zheng Lu; Zhen-Dong Jin; Yu-Hong Hu; Jian-Guo Yu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The development of a decision support system for the pathological diagnosis of human cerebral tumours based on a neural network classifier.

Authors:  G Sieben; M Praet; H Roels; G Otte; L Boullart; L Calliauw
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Modeling mortality in the intensive care unit: comparing the performance of a back-propagation, associative-learning neural network with multivariate logistic regression.

Authors:  G S Doig; K J Inman; W J Sibbald; C M Martin; J M Robertson
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993

Review 8.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.