Literature DB >> 1461088

Evaluation of two new gadolinium chelates as contrast agents for MRI.

C B Wiegers1, M J Welch, T L Sharp, J J Brown, W H Perman, Y Sun, R J Motekaitis, A E Martell.   

Abstract

Two new gadolinium chelates were investigated for potential use as tissue-specific contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. In vitro measurements of stability constants, octanol/water partition coefficients and relaxation times in solutions of water and human serum albumin (HSA) were performed with each new chelate and compared with gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, Gd(DTPA). Biodistribution studies and magnetic resonance imaging in rats were used to evaluate the new chelates in vivo. The stability constants (log K) of gadolinium-N,N''-bis(3-hydroxy-6-methyl-2- pyridylmethyl)diethylenetriamine-N,N',N''-triacetic acid, Gd(DTTA-HP), and gadolinium-1,7,13-triaza-4,10,16-trioxacyclooctadecane-N,N', N''-triacetic acid, Gd(TTCT), were determined to be 23.65 and 18.07, respectively. These can be compared to a literature value of 22.46 for Gd(DTPA). Octanol/water partition coefficients for both complexes showed they were more lipophilic than Gd(DTPA). Gd(DTTA-HP) exhibited a smaller relaxivity in water but a larger relaxivity in 4% HSA than Gd(DTPA). Gd(TTCT) exhibited a lower relaxivity than Gd(DTPA) in both water and 4% HSA. Both complexes showed similar biodistributions to Gd(DTPA) no carrier-added concentrations. Gd(DTTA-HP) had a greater percent change in signal intensity than Gd(DTPA) on T1-weighted spin-echo images in the heart, liver, and kidney. Percent change in signal intensity for Gd(TTCT) was lower than Gd(DTPA) in heart, liver, and kidney.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461088     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(92)90444-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  4 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging and diagnostics.

Authors:  Christine Rümenapp; Bernhard Gleich; Axel Haase
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Effect of concentration on the accuracy of convective imaging distribution of a gadolinium-based surrogate tracer.

Authors:  Ashok R Asthagiri; Stuart Walbridge; John D Heiss; Russell R Lonser
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents.

Authors:  Joan Estelrich; María Jesús Sánchez-Martín; Maria Antònia Busquets
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-03-06

Review 4.  Advantages and Limitations of Current Techniques for Analyzing the Biodistribution of Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lauren Arms; Doug W Smith; Jamie Flynn; William Palmer; Antony Martin; Ameha Woldu; Susan Hua
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.810

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.