BACKGROUND: We assessed the suitability of event-related potential frontal and temporoparietal P300 changes as intermediate phenotypes in genetic studies of schizophrenia. We applied a principal component analysis approach based on the notion that P300 abnormalities in siblings of schizophrenic patients may involve a widespread network of relatively weak cortical generators and because an earlier, smaller study that used a topographic analysis of covariance model did not show that localized P300 changes predict risk for schizophrenia. METHODS: P300 changes in 66 schizophrenic patients, 115 healthy siblings of schizophrenic patients, and 89 unrelated controls were studied during a standard auditory oddball paradigm. Principal components were calculated across electrodes, revealing frontal and temporoparietal components for latency and amplitude, respectively. For the frontal and temporoparietal P300 amplitude and latency components, the intraclass correlations (ICCs) between sib-pairs (pairs of unaffected siblings and schizophrenic index patients) and the relative risk ratios (lambda) were determined. RESULTS: Compared with controls, schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings showed significant reductions in the temporoparietal P300 amplitude component. Both groups were also characterized by a significantly higher frontal P300 amplitude component. Significant ICCs and increased relative risk ratios were found for the frontal (ICCU = 0.18; P =.04; lambda = 3.4) and temporoparietal (ICCU = 0.24; P =.01; lambda = 1.7) P300 amplitude components. CONCLUSIONS: Temporoparietal P300 amplitude reduction and frontal P300 amplitude increase seem to be quantitative phenotypes associated with increased risk of schizophrenia. Both measures may be useful for increasing the statistical power of genetic studies of schizophrenia.
BACKGROUND: We assessed the suitability of event-related potential frontal and temporoparietalP300 changes as intermediate phenotypes in genetic studies of schizophrenia. We applied a principal component analysis approach based on the notion that P300 abnormalities in siblings of schizophrenicpatients may involve a widespread network of relatively weak cortical generators and because an earlier, smaller study that used a topographic analysis of covariance model did not show that localized P300 changes predict risk for schizophrenia. METHODS:P300 changes in 66 schizophrenicpatients, 115 healthy siblings of schizophrenicpatients, and 89 unrelated controls were studied during a standard auditory oddball paradigm. Principal components were calculated across electrodes, revealing frontal and temporoparietal components for latency and amplitude, respectively. For the frontal and temporoparietalP300 amplitude and latency components, the intraclass correlations (ICCs) between sib-pairs (pairs of unaffected siblings and schizophrenic index patients) and the relative risk ratios (lambda) were determined. RESULTS: Compared with controls, schizophrenicpatients and their unaffected siblings showed significant reductions in the temporoparietalP300 amplitude component. Both groups were also characterized by a significantly higher frontal P300 amplitude component. Significant ICCs and increased relative risk ratios were found for the frontal (ICCU = 0.18; P =.04; lambda = 3.4) and temporoparietal (ICCU = 0.24; P =.01; lambda = 1.7) P300 amplitude components. CONCLUSIONS:Temporoparietal P300 amplitude reduction and frontal P300 amplitude increase seem to be quantitative phenotypes associated with increased risk of schizophrenia. Both measures may be useful for increasing the statistical power of genetic studies of schizophrenia.
Authors: Olga Rass; Jennifer K Forsyth; Giri P Krishnan; William P Hetrick; Mallory J Klaunig; Alan Breier; Brian F O'Donnell; Colleen A Brenner Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shiva Fekri; Shelly Ben-David; Cheryl M Corcoran; Gerard E Bruder Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Lauren E Ethridge; Jordan P Hamm; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Brett A Clementz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Lindsay Rutter; Frederick W Carver; Tom Holroyd; Sreenivasan Rajamoni Nadar; Judy Mitchell-Francis; Jose Apud; Daniel R Weinberger; Richard Coppola Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Daniel Mamah; Michael P Harms; Lei Wang; Deanna Barch; Paul Thompson; Jaeyun Kim; Michael I Miller; John G Csernansky Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 13.382