Literature DB >> 14609591

Optimal final lumen area and predictors of target lesion revascularization after stent implantation in small coronary arteries.

Ioannis Iakovou1, Gary S Mintz, George Dangas, Alexandre Abizaid, Roxana Mehran, Alexandra J Lansky, Yoshio Kobayashi, Makoto Hirose, Dale T Ashby, Gregg W Stone, Jeffrey W Moses, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

Despite similar early clinical events, patients who undergo treatment of small vessels are at an increased risk for target lesion revascularization (TLR) after coronary artery stenting. We sought to determine predictors of TLR after stent implantation in small coronary arteries. We identified 423 consecutive patients who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided small vessel stenting procedures in 465 coronary lesions with an angiographic reference vessel diameter of <2.75 mm. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on a final IVUS lumen area of < or =6.0 mm2 (n=345 lesions, group I) and >6.0 mm2 (n=115, group II). Baseline patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, except for a higher rate of restenotic lesions in group I and bifurcation lesions in group II. Group I had higher TLR rates at 1 year compared with group II patients (39% vs 26%, p = 0.02). The TLR rate appeared to decrease with greater stent expansion, especially at >90% of the reference vessel area, as assessed by IVUS. By multivariate analysis, an IVUS final stent area of < or =6 mm2, diabetes, absence of prior myocardial infarction, and history of intervention were independent predictors of 1-year TLR in this population. Final stent area of >6.0 mm2 and greater stent expansion were associated with a decrease in TLR. Therefore, there does not appear to be any "downside" to aggressive stent implantation strategies in small vessels. In contrast, IVUS allows maximization of final lumen dimensions to minimize clinical restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14609591     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

1.  Are drug eluting stents really worth the money?

Authors:  M Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Coronary balloon catheter tip damage. A bench study of a clinical problem.

Authors:  Trine Ø Barkholt; John A Ormiston; Patricia Ding; Bruce Webber; Ben Ubod; Stephen Waite; Mark Wi Webster
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.