Literature DB >> 14609159

Self-assessed quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Simone A Betchen1, Jane Walsh, Kalmon D Post.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine if factors such as postoperative hearing, facial function, headaches, or other factors have an impact on self-assessed quality of life (QOL) after acoustic neuroma surgery.
METHODS: The SF-36 and seven additional questions on the impact of surgery on the QOL were sent to 135 consecutive patients who had undergone acoustic neuroma surgery. The Spearman rho correlations were calculated for each of the eight categories of the SF-36 (general health, physical functioning, physical role limitations, emotional role limitations, mental health, energy/vitality, pain, social functioning). The results were correlated with patients' sex, age, persistent headache, years since surgery, postoperative hearing level, and facial function. The response rate was 74.8%. The transformed scores of the eight categories of the SF-36 were lower than age-matched healthy controls in approximately half of the categories. The strongest trend toward lower scores with statistical significance in two categories was persistent headaches. Some categories demonstrated trends toward lower scores with females or age older than 55 years. Postoperative hearing and facial functioning, and time since surgery showed no statistically significant impact on QOL measured by the SF-36. Responses to the additional questions indicate that hearing, facial function, and headache influenced people's feelings about surgery and had an impact on their return to work.
CONCLUSIONS: The QOL scores are not consistently lower than population normative values compared with different normative studies. The strongest correlation was between the presence of persistent headache and QOL. Other correlations were not consistent in all categories, and few were statistically significant. These trends in some categories do not explain the difference seen between patients after acoustic neuroma surgery in this study and normal populations in other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14609159     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.5.0818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  11 in total

1.  Risk Recall of Complications Associated with Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment.

Authors:  Khodayar Goshtasbi; Mehdi Abouzari; Omid Moshtaghi; Marlon Maducdoc; Brandon M Lehrich; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  The Effect of Observation versus Microsurgical Excision on Quality of Life in Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Dosh Sandooram; Rachael Hornigold; Beth Grunfeld; Nicholas Thomas; Neil D Kitchen; Michael Gleeson
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

3.  Quality of life in patients with skull base tumors: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

4.  Improvement of quality of life in patients surgically treated for asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Shigeo Yamashiro; Toru Nishi; Kazunari Koga; Tomoaki Goto; Masatomo Kaji; Daisuke Muta; Jun-ichi Kuratsu; Shodo Fujioka
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  [Acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). Treatment from a neurosurgical perspective].

Authors:  U Schick; A Unterberg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas: complication avoidance.

Authors:  Shervin Rahimpour; Allan H Friedman; Takanori Fukushima; Ali R Zomorodi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Quality of life after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Matthias Scheich; Christian Ginzkey; Edith Reuter; Wilma Harnisch; Desiree Ehrmann; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  What intervention is best practice for vestibular schwannomas? A systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  John G Wolbers; Alof Hg Dallenga; Alejandra Mendez Romero; Anne van Linge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Optimal Volume of the Residual Tumor to Predict Long-term Tumor Control Using Stereotactic Radiosurgery after Facial Nerve-preserving Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Won Jae Lee; Jung Il Lee; Jung Won Choi; Doo Sik Kong; Do Hyun Nam; Yang Sun Cho; Hyung Jin Shin; Ho Jun Seol
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Fatigue in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Dhanushan Dhayalan; Morten Lund-Johansen; Monica Finnkirk; Øystein Vesterli Tveiten
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.