T N Williams1, C I Newbold. 1. Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories, Kilifi, Kenya. twilliams@kilifi.mimcom.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The acquisition of antibodies directed toward variant surface antigens (VSAs) expressed on the surface of the trophozoite-infected red blood cell is an important determinant of natural immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. In recent years, flow cytometry has been used increasingly to investigate these responses, but few systematic assessments of this method are available in the published literature. METHODS: We developed a highly standardized experimental protocol and used parasites of the A4 laboratory clone, a monoclonal antibody to the VSA expressed by this clone (monoclonal antibody BC6), and a single pool of hyperimmune plasma to explore the parameters responsible for variations in VSA antibody responses measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Despite strenuous efforts to standardize our flow cytometric assay, we found marked variability in our assay readout, even between repeat experiments using identical antibody and parasite combinations. We found no remediable cause for much of this variability. However, we identified three major factors that we considered important contributors: antibody concentration, nonspecific antibody binding to uninfected red blood cells, and parasite agglutination. CONCLUSIONS: A number of potential pitfalls should be considered when designing and interpreting studies using this technique. In particular, we suggest that comparisons between assays conducted on different occasions can be made only through reference to carefully selected standards. We anticipate that a better appreciation of the factors that lead to assay variation will assist the design of improved experimental protocols. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The acquisition of antibodies directed toward variant surface antigens (VSAs) expressed on the surface of the trophozoite-infected red blood cell is an important determinant of natural immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. In recent years, flow cytometry has been used increasingly to investigate these responses, but few systematic assessments of this method are available in the published literature. METHODS: We developed a highly standardized experimental protocol and used parasites of the A4 laboratory clone, a monoclonal antibody to the VSA expressed by this clone (monoclonal antibody BC6), and a single pool of hyperimmune plasma to explore the parameters responsible for variations in VSA antibody responses measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Despite strenuous efforts to standardize our flow cytometric assay, we found marked variability in our assay readout, even between repeat experiments using identical antibody and parasite combinations. We found no remediable cause for much of this variability. However, we identified three major factors that we considered important contributors: antibody concentration, nonspecific antibody binding to uninfected red blood cells, and parasite agglutination. CONCLUSIONS: A number of potential pitfalls should be considered when designing and interpreting studies using this technique. In particular, we suggest that comparisons between assays conducted on different occasions can be made only through reference to carefully selected standards. We anticipate that a better appreciation of the factors that lead to assay variation will assist the design of improved experimental protocols. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Amy K Bei; Ababacar Diouf; Kazutoyo Miura; Daniel B Larremore; Ulf Ribacke; Gregory Tullo; Eli L Moss; Daniel E Neafsey; Rachel F Daniels; Amir E Zeituni; Iguosadolo Nosamiefan; Sarah K Volkman; Ambroise D Ahouidi; Daouda Ndiaye; Tandakha Dieye; Souleymane Mboup; Caroline O Buckee; Carole A Long; Dyann F Wirth Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Sarah Frankland; Salenna R Elliott; Francisca Yosaatmadja; James G Beeson; Stephen J Rogerson; Akinola Adisa; Leann Tilley Journal: Eukaryot Cell Date: 2007-07-20
Authors: Amir E Zeituni; Kazutoyo Miura; Mahamadou Diakite; Saibou Doumbia; Samuel E Moretz; Ababacar Diouf; Gregory Tullo; Tatiana M Lopera-Mesa; Cameron D Bess; Neida K Mita-Mendoza; Jennifer M Anderson; Rick M Fairhurst; Carole A Long Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C L Mackintosh; T Mwangi; S M Kinyanjui; M Mosobo; R Pinches; T N Williams; C I Newbold; K Marsh Journal: Int J Parasitol Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Federica Verra; Jacques Simpore; George M Warimwe; Kevin K Tetteh; Tevis Howard; Faith H A Osier; Germana Bancone; Pamela Avellino; Isa Blot; Greg Fegan; Peter C Bull; Thomas N Williams; David J Conway; Kevin Marsh; David Modiano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Claire L Mackintosh; Zoe Christodoulou; Tabitha W Mwangi; Moses Kortok; Robert Pinches; Thomas N Williams; Kevin Marsh; Christopher I Newbold Journal: Malar J Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 2.979