Literature DB >> 14608533

Tissue microarray analysis of neuroendocrine differentiation and its prognostic significance in breast cancer.

Nikita Makretsov1, C Blake Gilks, Andrew J Coldman, Malcolm Hayes, David Huntsman.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to detect neuroendocrine differentiation (NE), to determine its association with major clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer, and to study the prognostic significance of NE differentiation in a group of breast carcinomas by using tissue microarray (TMA) methodology. NE differentiation was studied by using 3 markers, synaptophysin (Syn), chromogranin A (ChA), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in a group of 334 patients with breast carcinoma. TMA blocks were made by using duplicate 0.6-mm-diameter tissue cores from each paraffin block. Results of immunostaining were scored on a 4-point scale, that is, as negative, weak, intermediate, and strong immunoreactivity. Positive staining of breast cancers for any of the 3 NE markers was detected in 19.5% of cases. Expression of a single marker was present in 16.2% of cases, and expression of 2 or 3 markers in combination was detected in 3.3% of cases. There was no statistically significant correlation of NE phenotype with tumor morphology, except mucinous carcinoma (3 of 6 cases positive), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or nodal status. A weak correlation was noted between synaptophysin staining and higher tumor grade (P = 0.029). Analysis of disease-specific and overall survival based on up to 20 years of follow-up data showed a correlation between NSE expression and improved disease-specific (P = 0.043) and overall survival (P = 0.03) in univariate but not in multivariate analysis. The expression of Syn and ChA, as well as coexpression of multiple NE markers, had no prognostic significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608533     DOI: 10.1053/s0046-8177(03)00411-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  31 in total

Review 1.  The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications.

Authors:  Alessandro Bartolomucci; Roberta Possenti; Sushil K Mahata; Reiner Fischer-Colbrie; Y Peng Loh; Stephen R J Salton
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  The grey zone between pure (neuro)endocrine and non-(neuro)endocrine tumours: a comment on concepts and classification of mixed exocrine-endocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Guido Rindi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  The Clinical Significance of Neuroendocrine Features in Invasive Breast Carcinomas.

Authors:  Billy Shui-Wun Lai; Julia Y Tsang; Ivan K Poon; Yan Shao; Siu-Ki Chan; Fiona K Tam; Sai-Yin Cheung; Ka-Ho Shea; Gary M Tse
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-06-16

Review 4.  Primary neuroendocrine breast cancer, how much do we know so far?

Authors:  Homam Alkaied; Kassem Harris; Basem Azab; Qun Dai
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  CAMK1D amplification implicated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bergamaschi; Young H Kim; Kevin A Kwei; Yoon La Choi; Melanie Bocanegra; Anita Langerød; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; David G Huntsman; Stefanie S Jeffrey; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Metastases from neuroendocrine tumors to the breast are more common than previously thought. A diagnostic pitfall?

Authors:  Joakim Crona; Dan Granberg; Olov Norlén; Fredrik Wärnberg; Peter Stålberg; Per Hellman; Peyman Björklund
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Prognostic importance of neuroendocrine differentiation in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Masataka Sawaki; Kazuki Yokoi; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Reiko Watanabe; Chikara Kagawa; Hideki Takada; Shigenori Sato; Tomohiro Yamada; Toyone Kikumori; Tsuneo Imai; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  [Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast cancer].

Authors:  H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Samuel Leung; Dmitry Turbin; Kelli Montgomery; Blake Gilks; Rob West; Melinda Carrier; David Huntsman; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Quantitative assessment of tissue biomarkers and construction of a model to predict outcome in breast cancer using multiple imputation.

Authors:  John W Emerson; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Lyndsay Harris; David L Rimm; David P Tuck
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.