Literature DB >> 14608436

Adherence to Drug-Dispensation and Drug-Administration Laws and Guidelines in Collegiate Athletic Training Rooms.

Leamor Kahanov1, David Furst, Sam Johnson, Jeff Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence in collegiate athletic training rooms to federal drug laws and to describe current practices. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We created a survey of drug-law adherence using federal drug laws and administration guidelines and mailed it to randomly selected certified athletic trainers (ATCs) in United States college and university athletic training rooms. Means, standard deviations, and cross-tabulations were calculated to assess demographic information. A nonparametric test (Kruskal-Wallis) was calculated to compare adherence-score means.
RESULTS: Adherence scores were collected from 168 college and university ATCs. The data suggest that ATCs in most athletic training rooms are still not complying with federal drug laws. Drug-dispensation and -administration adherence scores ranged from 5 to 20 (20% to 80% adherence) of 25 points. On average, 49.3% of ATCs in athletic training rooms had marginal adherence to federal regulations (12.34 adherence score). The difference between adherence scores and National Collegiate Athletic Association athletic divisions (Division I, II, III, and III/National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics; P <.002) was significant. In most athletic training rooms, ATCs (55.9%) and students (13.3%) dispensed prescription drugs. In addition, ATCs in most athletic training rooms (53.8%) administered any amount of over-the-counter medication as necessary, and many did not record the transaction (46.2%). DISCUSSION: Nine years after the National Collegiate Athletic Association drug-distribution study in university athletic programs, similar problem areas persist, including unqualified personnel dispensing medications, inappropriately packaged and labeled medications, and a lack of record keeping.
CONCLUSIONS: Athletic trainers should work in conjunction with members of the sports medicine team to review federal and state laws and revise institutional drug policies and procedures to comply with regulations in order to provide the best health care to student athletes in a legal and safe manner.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608436      PMCID: PMC233180     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  2 in total

Review 1.  Drug distribution in the training room.

Authors:  P Huff
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.182

2.  University-based sports pharmacy program.

Authors:  K O Price; P S Huff; B J Isetts; M A Goldwire
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 2.637

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Inter-Association Consensus Statement: The Management of Medications by the Sports Medicine Team.

Authors:  Cindy J Chang; Timothy Weston; Jessica D Higgs; Monica Ohkubo; Amy Sauls; Fred Tedeschi; Marianne White; Craig C Young
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Adherence to drug-dispensation and drug-administration laws and guidelines in collegiate athletic training rooms: a 5-year review.

Authors:  Leamor Kahanov; Jeff Roberts; Emily M Wughalter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  National collegiate athletic association division I athletes' use of nonprescription medication.

Authors:  Douglas A Wolf; Thomas W Miller; Linda S Pescatello; Christopher Barnes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.