Literature DB >> 14608314

Endoscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results at minimum 2-year follow-up.

David J Deehan1, Lucy J Salmon, Vivianne J Russell, Leo A Pinczewski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with retention of the PCL remnant and hamstring tendon autograft with interference screw fixation in patients with isolated PCL laxity. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective case series with minimum 2-year follow-up evaluation.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients for whom conservative management had failed underwent surgery using a 4-strand hamstring tendon autograft with interference screw fixation. The median time from injury to reconstructive surgery was 9 months (range, 4 to 120 months). At a minimum of 2 years after surgery, patients were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Ligament evaluation, Lysholm knee score, and KT-1000 instrumented testing.
RESULTS: Before surgery, the median Lysholm knee score was 64 (95% confidence interval, 51 to 67). No patient rated knee function as normal, and all patients showed at least grade 2 posterior drawer laxity. At review, the median Lysholm knee score was 94 (95% confidence interval, 83 to 94), 56% rated the knee as normal and only one patient was found to exhibit grade 2 laxity on posterior drawer testing. Before injury, 94% of patients participated in moderate or strenuous activity. This figure fell to 26% after injury and had increased to 63% at review.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic reconstruction of PCL laxity using single-bundle 4-strand hamstring tendon autograft, without removal of the PCL stump, provides a significant reduction in knee symptoms and allows 63% of patients to return to moderate or strenuous activity. This is an effective procedure for symptomatic patients who have isolated PCL laxity and for whom conservative management has failed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608314     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  [Outcome 4 years after isolated single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  M Lahner; T Vogel; M S Schulz; M J Strobel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Odd Arve Lien; Emilie Jul-Larsen Aas; Steinar Johansen; Tom Clement Ludvigsen; Wender Figved; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prospective analysis using a patient-based health-related scale shows lower functional scores after posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions as compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee.

Authors:  Satoshi Ochiai; Tetsuo Hagino; Shinya Senga; Takashi Yamashita; Takashi Ando; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Acute augmentation for interstitial insufficiency of the posterior cruciate ligament. A two to five year clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Terence Wai-Kit Chan; Chi-Chung Kong; Angelo Del Buono; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

Review 6.  Single Versus Double-Bundle PCL Reconstruction: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Christopher J Tucker; Patrick W Joyner; Nathan K Endres
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

7.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for chronic lesions: clinical experience with hamstring versus ligament advanced reinforcement system as graft.

Authors:  D Saragaglia; F Francony; J Gaillot; R Pailhé; B Rubens-Duval; G Lateur
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Clinical studies on posterior cruciate ligament tears have weak design.

Authors:  Anne Marie Eriksen Watsend; Toril M Ø Osestad; Rune B Jakobsen; Rune B Jacobsen; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Optimal management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: current perspectives.

Authors:  K Donald Shelbourne; Rodney W Benner; Jonathan D Ringenberg; Tinker Gray
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2017-04-05

Review 10.  A systematic review of double-bundle versus single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yan-Song Qi; Hai-Jun Wang; Shao-Jie Wang; Zheng-Zheng Zhang; Ai-Bing Huang; Jia-Kuo Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.