OBJECTIVE: To identify the cut-off values of the baseline (cycle day 3) levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E(2)) for improving the outcome prediction of GnRH antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and to determine whether the predictive accuracy of these values is affected by the patient's clinical prognosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: An IVF clinic in a tertiary medical center. Women undergoing 230 consecutive IVF cycles using a GnRH antagonist protocol. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Outcome of IVF, measured by ovarian response and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Lower baseline levels of FSH and E(2), but not LH, correlated with improved ovarian response and pregnancy rates in IVF cycles using a GnRH antagonist. Compared with our currently used criteria, the cut-off values of FSH <10 IU/L and E(2) <56 pg/mL would have significantly improved the IVF outcome in a population of patients with normal prognosis. However, a stricter baseline FSH cut-off value of 8 IU/L would have been required to improve the IVF outcome in a population of patients with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSION(S): The outcome of IVF may be improved by modifying the hormonal starting criteria to take into account individual patient characteristics such as clinical prognosis.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the cut-off values of the baseline (cycle day 3) levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E(2)) for improving the outcome prediction of GnRH antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and to determine whether the predictive accuracy of these values is affected by the patient's clinical prognosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: An IVF clinic in a tertiary medical center. Women undergoing 230 consecutive IVF cycles using a GnRH antagonist protocol. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Outcome of IVF, measured by ovarian response and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Lower baseline levels of FSH and E(2), but not LH, correlated with improved ovarian response and pregnancy rates in IVF cycles using a GnRH antagonist. Compared with our currently used criteria, the cut-off values of FSH <10 IU/L and E(2) <56 pg/mL would have significantly improved the IVF outcome in a population of patients with normal prognosis. However, a stricter baseline FSH cut-off value of 8 IU/L would have been required to improve the IVF outcome in a population of patients with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSION(S): The outcome of IVF may be improved by modifying the hormonal starting criteria to take into account individual patient characteristics such as clinical prognosis.
Authors: Min Hye Choi; Ji Hee Yoo; Hye Ok Kim; Sun Hwa Cha; Chan Woo Park; Kwang Moon Yang; In Ok Song; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang Journal: Clin Exp Reprod Med Date: 2011-09-30
Authors: Shireen Jawed; Rehana Rehman; Mohammad Ashfaq Ali; Umme Hani Abdullah; Hina Gul Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.088