Literature DB >> 14607390

A quantitative neuromotor predictor of antidepressant non-response in patients with major depression.

Michael P Caligiuri1, Valentina Gentili, Sonja Eberson, John Kelsoe, Mark Rapaport, J Christian Gillin.   

Abstract

Predicting response to antidepressant medication has been a challenge to clinicians and researchers for decades. Attention has been paid to the role of motor retardation as a putative indicator of treatment response, yet previous findings have been mixed. One reason for this inconsistency may be related to the subjective nature of motor retardation and how it is assessed. In the present study, we adopted a measure of motor programming previously shown to characterize parkinsonian bradykinesia to test whether neuromotor function could predict response to antidepressant treatment. Twenty-eight patients (14 males and 14 females with a mean age of 42.0 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for a depressive disorder were randomized to receive 8 weeks of treatment with one of three antidepressant medications (sertraline, phenelzine, or bupropion). Treatment outcomes were assessed using the 17-item version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). Patients were considered asymptomatic if their post-treatment HRSD total score was equal to or less than 7. Treatment responders (n=15) had significantly less baseline impairment (P=0.01) on the neuromotor measure than non-responders (n=13). There was a significant relationship between amount of improvement on the HRSD and severity of baseline neuromotor function (r=-0.51; P=0.006). No significant group effects were found for baseline psychomotor slowing or clinical ratings of motor retardation. These results demonstrate that a quantitative measure of motor programming may be a useful predictor of antidepressant non-response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14607390     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00107-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  11 in total

Review 1.  Psychomotor retardation in depression: biological underpinnings, measurement, and treatment.

Authors:  Jeylan S Buyukdura; Shawn M McClintock; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 5.067

2.  Effects of lisdexamfetamine and s-citalopram, alone and in combination, on effort-related choice behavior in the rat.

Authors:  Samantha E Yohn; Laura Lopez-Cruz; Peter H Hutson; Merce Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The VMAT-2 inhibitor tetrabenazine alters effort-related decision making as measured by the T-maze barrier choice task: reversal with the adenosine A2A antagonist MSX-3 and the catecholamine uptake blocker bupropion.

Authors:  Samantha E Yohn; Christian Thompson; Patrick A Randall; Christie A Lee; Christa E Müller; Younis Baqi; Mercè Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Neuropsychological characteristics as predictors of SSRI treatment response in depressed subjects.

Authors:  Marianne Gorlyn; John G Keilp; Michael F Grunebaum; Bonnie P Taylor; Maria A Oquendo; Gerard E Bruder; Jonathan W Stewart; Gil Zalsman; J John Mann
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Quantitative assessment of motor abnormalities in untreated patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  James B Lohr; Todd May; Michael P Caligiuri
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response in clinical care (EMBARC): Rationale and design.

Authors:  Madhukar H Trivedi; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Ramin V Parsey; Benji T Kurian; Mary L Phillips; Maria A Oquendo; Gerard Bruder; Diego Pizzagalli; Marisa Toups; Crystal Cooper; Phil Adams; Sarah Weyandt; David W Morris; Bruce D Grannemann; R Todd Ogden; Randy Buckner; Melvin McInnis; Helena C Kraemer; Eva Petkova; Thomas J Carmody; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Digital Clock Drawing: differentiating "thinking" versus "doing" in younger and older adults with depression.

Authors:  Jamie Cohen; Dana L Penney; Randall Davis; David J Libon; Rodney A Swenson; Olusola Ajilore; Anand Kumar; Melissa Lamar
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Bupropion increases selection of high effort activity in rats tested on a progressive ratio/chow feeding choice procedure: implications for treatment of effort-related motivational symptoms.

Authors:  Patrick A Randall; Christie A Lee; Samantha J Podurgiel; Evan Hart; Samantha E Yohn; Myles Jones; Margaret Rowland; Laura López-Cruz; Mercè Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 9.  Psychomotor retardation in depression: a systematic review of diagnostic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Djamila Bennabi; Pierre Vandel; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Thierry Pozzo; Emmanuel Haffen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Cortico-cortical white matter motor pathway microstructure is related to psychomotor retardation in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Tobias Bracht; Andrea Federspiel; Susanne Schnell; Helge Horn; Oliver Höfle; Roland Wiest; Thomas Dierks; Werner Strik; Thomas J Müller; Sebastian Walther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.