Literature DB >> 14607375

When to diagnose and how to treat prostate cancer in the "not too fit" elderly.

Philipp Dahm1, Ari D Silverstein, Alon Z Weizer, Alfonso Crisci, Johannes Vieweg, David F Paulson.   

Abstract

The appropriate management of elderly patients diagnosed with prostate cancer remains controversial. In order to provide guidelines as to when aggressive local treatment may be indicated, we provide estimates of the long-term probability of death from prostate cancer and other competing causes in patients of 70 years of age or older, who underwent radical surgery in the form of radical perineal prostatectomy for clinically non-metastatic disease. In this study, a total of 484 patients with an age of 70 or above who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy between 1970 and 2000 comprised a retrospective cohort of patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer. Of these patients, 461 patients (95.3%) had a minimum follow-up of half a year and were included in the analysis. The median age was 73 years (range 70-81 years) and the median follow-up was 5.4 years. Overall 115 men died during the follow-up period with 49.6% of deaths attributable to prostate cancer. The median time to cancer-associated death was 17.5 years and the median time to death of any cause 11.6 years. When the likelihood of death from prostate cancer as a function of Gleason score was estimated, the 10-year cancer-associated death rates of patients with Gleason scores of 2-6, 7 and 8-10, were 15.2, 25.2 and 40.2%, respectively. In the subset of patient with margin positive disease the estimated likelihood of a cancer-associated death was 45.3% after 10 years. While the median time to cancer-associated death for margin positive patients with a Gleason score of 2-6 was not reached, patients with a Gleason score of 7 and 8-10 experienced median cancer-associated survival times of 9.6 and 7.6 years, respectively. In conclusion, Gleason score is a strong predictor of the likelihood of prostate cancer related death in elderly patients. Patients with a given Gleason score and a projected life expectancy of at least 10 years may be at similar risk of dying of prostate cancer as younger patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14607375     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  5 in total

1.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

2.  Current trends in diagnostic and therapeutic principles for prostate cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Koji Okihara; Takumi Shiraishi; Osamu Ukimura; Yoichi Mizutani; Akihiro Kawauchi; Tsuneharu Miki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The national-wide incidence of prostate-specific antigen testing trend for a decade in Korea by age group.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Kwon-Chan Roh; Byung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Should Contemporary Western Guidelines Based on Studies Conducted in the 2000s Be Adopted for the Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Policy for Asian Men in the 2020s?

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Byung Hoon Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.494

5.  A comparison of the survival outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in patients over 75 years old with non-metastatic prostate cancer: A Korean multicenter study.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Sung-Woo Park; U-Syn Ha; Jae Young Joung; Seung-Hwan Jeong; Seok-Soo Byun; Seong Soo Jeon; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-08-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.