Literature DB >> 14607161

Modality-specific effects in inhibitory mechanisms: the interaction of peripheral and central components in working memory.

Paola Palladino1, Nicola Mammarella, Tomaso Vecchi.   

Abstract

Working memory is a complex system assumed to encompass both storage and processing components. At the same time, several authors have suggested the existence of separate peripheral modality-specific subsystems, in particular a verbal and a visuo-spatial mechanism. In the present research, we explored the hypothesis that modality-specific mechanisms may also operate in the central processing component. Inhibitory control has traditionally been considered as a typical function of the central executive, devoted to selecting, processing, and eliminating irrelevant information. We designed verbal and visuo-spatial tasks involving similar procedures and comparable levels of inhibitory control. Results indicate that accuracy profiles are similar in the two conditions; however, the patterns of data measuring inhibitory control, i.e., percentage of intrusion errors, are opposite in the case of verbal (intrusions decreased in more complex trials) and visuo-spatial (intrusions increased in more complex trials) material. These data are consistent with theoretical models of working memory suggesting that modality-specific effects emerge even in central processes and that both material-dependent and process-dependent features must be considered in working memory tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14607161     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00123-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  6 in total

1.  Modality specific cerebro-cerebellar activations in verbal working memory: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Matthew P Kirschen; S H Annabel Chen; John E Desmond
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.342

2.  Effects of aging on interference control in selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Selene Cansino; Daniela Guzzon; Massimiliano Martinelli; Michele Barollo; Clara Casco
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

3.  Dichotic listening performance and effort as a function of spectral resolution and interaural symmetry.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Wait for it! A twin study of inhibitory control in early childhood.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gagne; Kimberly J Saudino
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Out with the Old and in with the New: the Contribution of Prefrontal and Cerebellar Areas to Backward Inhibition.

Authors:  Silvia Picazio; Francesca Foti; Massimiliano Oliveri; Giacomo Koch; Laura Petrosini; Fabio Ferlazzo; Stefano Sdoia
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Out with the Old and in with the New--Is Backward Inhibition a Domain-Specific Process?

Authors:  Francesca Foti; Stefano Sdoia; Deny Menghini; Stefano Vicari; Laura Petrosini; Fabio Ferlazzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.