Literature DB >> 14607149

Real versus facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa Gambling Task.

Caroline H Bowman1, Oliver H Turnbull.   

Abstract

The Iowa Gambling Task (([Bechara et al., 1994]) is an effective neuropsychological tool for the assessment of 'real-life' decision-making in a laboratory environment. It has been employed in a wide range of circumstances, though researchers have sometimes employed real money reinforcers instead of the facsimile (or 'monopoly'-type) money used by. The present study investigated whether the type of reinforcer produced any differences in performance. There were no significant differences between the two conditions, though the Facsimile Money condition produced a greater range (and a higher standard deviation) than the Real Money condition. This finding is especially important when considering the Gambling Task as a tool in clinical neuropsychology--where there are risks, at the individual subject level, of both false positive and false negative classification errors.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14607149     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00111-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  33 in total

1.  Recruitment of intuitive versus analytic thinking strategies affects the role of working memory in a gambling task.

Authors:  Marta Gozzi; Paolo Cherubini; Costanza Papagno; Emanuela Bricolo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-10

Review 2.  Toward an animal model of gambling: delay discounting and the allure of unpredictable outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Eric E Ewan; Carla H Lagorio
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-12-15

Review 3.  Construct validity of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Melissa T Buelow; Julie A Suhr
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Gambling primates: reactions to a modified Iowa Gambling Task in humans, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Darby Proctor; Rebecca A Williamson; Robert D Latzman; Frans B M de Waal; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Adolescent drinking and motivated decision-making: a cotwin-control investigation with monozygotic twins.

Authors:  Stephen M Malone; Monica Luciana; Sylia Wilson; Jordan C Sparks; Ruskin H Hunt; Kathleen M Thomas; William G Iacono
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Modulation of smoking and decision-making behaviors with transcranial direct current stimulation in tobacco smokers: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Shirley Fecteau; Sara Agosta; Antoine Hone-Blanchet; Felipe Fregni; Paulo Boggio; Domenic Ciraulo; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Decision-making and risk aversion among depressive adults.

Authors:  Moria J Smoski; Thomas R Lynch; M Zachary Rosenthal; Jennifer S Cheavens; Alexander L Chapman; Ranga R Krishnan
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02-02

Review 8.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Performance of young adult cannabis users on neurocognitive measures of impulsive behavior and their relationship to symptoms of cannabis use disorders.

Authors:  Raul Gonzalez; Randi Melissa Schuster; Robin J Mermelstein; Jasmin Vassileva; Eileen M Martin; Kathleen R Diviak
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Is there a recovery of decision-making function after frontal lobe damage? A study using alternative versions of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Lin Xiao; Samantha M W Wood; Natalie L Denburg; Georgina L Moreno; Michael Hernandez; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.