Literature DB >> 14606974

The illness representations of multiple sclerosis and their relations to outcome.

Rachel Vaughan1, Leslie Morrison, Edgar Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main aims of the present study were to explore the illness representations of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and investigate the relationship of these beliefs to outcome. Based on Leventhal et al.'s self-regulation model, the commonly accepted generic five-component structure of illness representations including identity, time-line, consequences, cause, and cure/controllability was used.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional, correlational design was employed for the study. Interrelationships among the illness representation components and the relationships between the components and outcome were explored using Pearson's r. To determine the contribution of the illness representation components to the explained variance in outcome, a series of stepwise multiple regression analyses was used.
METHOD: A total of 99 participants took part in the study. A series of measures were completed to assess (1). illness representations and (2). five specific areas of outcome.
RESULTS: Participants' illness representations of MS were consistent with the medical nature and understanding of this illness indicating that they held the perceptions of a strong illness identity, chronic time-line, no particular cause and no cure. Beliefs in the serious consequences of MS and limited control were also reported. Some important interrelationships among the illness representation components were demonstrated where a strong illness identity, chronic time-line view and perception of low control were related to more serious consequences. Overall, evidence was provided to suggest that illness representations contribute to outcome. The consequences component was associated with, and contributed to, the explained variance for each of the five outcome areas, indicating that the perception that MS has many negative effects on an individual's life was associated with greater levels of difficulty in all of the outcome areas. In addition, for each of the outcome variables, different combinations of illness representation components explained their variance. For example, higher levels of depression were associated with perceptions of a stronger illness identity, more serious consequences, acute time-line, and low control.
CONCLUSION: Overall support is provided for the application of the five-component structure of illness representations to MS and the likely contribution of such beliefs to outcome. The concept of illness representations therefore provides a useful framework for understanding the psychosocial effects of this illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14606974     DOI: 10.1348/135910703322370860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  12 in total

Review 1.  A review of assessment tools of illness representations: are these adapted for a work disability prevention context?

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Marie-Elise Labrecque; Suzy Ngomo; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-08-22

2.  Illness Beliefs, Treatment Beliefs and Information Needs as Starting Points for Patient Information: The Evaluation of an Intervention for Patients with Depression.

Authors:  Manuela Glattacker; Katja Heyduck; Cornelia Meffert; Teresa Jakob
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2018-09

3.  The mediating role of illness perception in the relationship between psychological hardiness and the health status of covid-19 (coronavirus disease) survived patients.

Authors:  Sajjad Rezaei; Mohammad Hoseini Nia; Mozhgan Vakilian
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-19

4.  Risk factors for moderate and severe persistent pain in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a prospective predictive study.

Authors:  Patrícia R Pinto; Teresa McIntyre; Ramón Ferrero; Armando Almeida; Vera Araújo-Soares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mental Representations of Illness in Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: How Do Patients Perceive Their Condition?

Authors:  Valentina E Di Mattei; Letizia Carnelli; Martina Mazzetti; Martina Bernardi; Rossella Di Pierro; Alice Bergamini; Giorgia Mangili; Massimo Candiani; Lucio Sarno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Patients' views and needs about systemic sclerosis and its management: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Luc Mouthon; Sophie Alami; Anne-Sophie Boisard; Benjamin Chaigne; Eric Hachulla; Serge Poiraudeau
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Illness Belief Network Questionnaire: Development and Evaluation of a Psychosomatic Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Farzad Goli; Hamidreza Roohafza; Awat Feizi; Ali Gholamrezaei; Mahboubeh Farzanegan; Marsa Hashemi; Tobias Kube; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04

8.  Work ability and return-to-work in cancer patients.

Authors:  A G E M de Boer; J H A M Verbeek; E R Spelten; A L J Uitterhoeve; A C Ansink; T M de Reijke; M Kammeijer; M A G Sprangers; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Impact of a 5-day expedition to machu picchu on persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Marie Beatrice D'hooghe; Peter Feys; Sam Deltour; Isabelle Van de Putte; Jan De Meue; Daphne Kos; Bert O Eijnde; Paul Van Asch
Journal:  Mult Scler Int       Date:  2014-05-21

10.  Rehabilitation use in multiple sclerosis: Do illness representations matter?

Authors:  Manuela Glattacker; Jürgen M Giesler; Katharina Klindtworth; Angelika Nebe
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.