Literature DB >> 14606737

Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?

Hartwig Woldag1, Guido Waldmann, Gabriele Heuschkel, Horst Hummelsheim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a repetitive training of complex movements of arm and hand contributes to functional recovery in stroke patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, multiple baseline design across individuals.
SETTING: Neurological rehabilitation centre.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-one patients with stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory.
INTERVENTIONS: Baseline phase: 'house-typical' occupational and physiotherapy; training phase: 'house-typical' therapy supplemented by repetitive training of (1) grasping and transport movements and (2) sawing movements of the affected arm over 10 minutes each, twice daily, five days per week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA, arm section), grip strength, rapid isotonic hand extension, three-dimensional motion analysis.
RESULTS: Patients experienced a continuous functional improvement of the affected arm (RMA score from initial 4.9 +/- 2.1 to 8.0 +/- 4.6, p < 0.001) and an increase of grip strength during the baseline and the training phase (from initial 102.4 +/- 43.3 N to 150.6 +/- 118.9 N, p < 0.05). Movement analysis revealed a trend to a more precise movement execution. The repetitive training of complex movements did not result in an additional benefit.
CONCLUSION: The repetitive training of complex movements does not further enhance the functional recovery of the affected arm and hand in stroke patients compared with functionally based occupational and physiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14606737     DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr669oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  7 in total

1.  Effects of intensive repetition of a new facilitation technique on motor functional recovery of the hemiplegic upper limb and hand.

Authors:  Kazumi Kawahira; Megumi Shimodozono; Seiji Etoh; Katsuya Kamada; Tomokazu Noma; Nobuyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Long-term sensory stimulation therapy improves hand function and restores cortical responsiveness in patients with chronic cerebral lesions. Three single case studies.

Authors:  Jan-Christoph Kattenstroth; Tobias Kalisch; Sören Peters; Martin Tegenthoff; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Keith R Lohse; Catherine E Lang; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 10.170

4.  Can Short-Term Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Combined With Visual Biofeedback Training Improve Hemiplegic Upper Limb Function of Subacute Stroke Patients?

Authors:  Hyun Seok; Seung Yeol Lee; Jihoon Kim; Jungho Yeo; Hyungdong Kang
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Introducing a feedback training system for guided home rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fabian Kohler; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Bilateral movement training promotes axonal remodeling of the corticospinal tract and recovery of motor function following traumatic brain injury in mice.

Authors:  H Nakagawa; M Ueno; T Itokazu; T Yamashita
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 7.  Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Keith R Lohse; Rebecca L Birkenmeier
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.