Literature DB >> 14605896

Finger skin cooling on contact with cold materials: a comparison between male and female responses during short-term exposures.

Ollie Jay1, George Havenith.   

Abstract

This study compares male and female contact cooling responses in order to ascertain whether a particular sex is at a greater risk to cold injury. Ten volunteers (five male, five female) participated, touching blocks of four different materials (aluminium, stainless steel, nylon and mahogany wood) with finger contact forces of 1.0 N, 2.9 N and 9.8 N, at a range of surface temperatures (-35 degrees C to +5 degrees C) appropriate for the thermal properties of the material. Contact temperature (TC) of the finger-pad was measured over time using a T-type thermocouple. Under fast cooling conditions (below 10 s to reach TC=0.5 degrees C), no significant difference was found between the cooling responses of males and females (P>0.05) for the 12 conditions tested. Under slow cooling conditions (above 10 s to reach TC=0.5 degrees C), females were found to have significantly faster skin cooling than males (P<0.05) for 18 of the 24 conditions tested. In order to investigate whether differences in hand anthropometry between these representative groups of males and females were related to differences in contact cooling response under slow-cooling conditions, a general linear model approach was used. Subsequent analyses of the residual variance in contact cooling data after the effects of material type, finger contact force and surface temperature had been accounted for showed that both sex and hand size correlated significantly with contact cooling response (P< or =0.001) with hand size showing the stronger impact and possibly being the determining factor. Conclusive proof of the latter would require an additional experiment using males and females of equal hand dimensions instead of representative groups as used here. This study showed females to be at a higher risk during contact with cold objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605896     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0986-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  12 in total

1.  Temperature limit values for gripping cold surfaces.

Authors:  J Malchaire; Q Geng; E Den Hartog; G Havenith; I Holmer; A Piette; S L Powell; H Rintamäki; S Rissanen
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2002-03

2.  Tactile discrimination and skin temperature.

Authors:  K A PROVINS; R MORTON
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Effect of food, alcohol, and hyoscine on body-temperature and reflex responses of men immersed in cold water.

Authors:  W R KEATINGE; M EVANS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-07-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Freezing temperature of finger skin.

Authors:  O Wilson; R F Goldman; G W Molnar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 5.  The hand in the cold, performance and risk.

Authors:  G Havenith; R Heus; H A Daanen
Journal:  Arctic Med Res       Date:  1995

Review 6.  Effects of thermal stress on human performance.

Authors:  A E Enander
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 7.  Sex differences in human thermoregulatory response to heat and cold stress.

Authors:  R L Burse
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Finger blood flow in healthy subjects of different age and sex and in patients with primary Raynaud's disease.

Authors:  A Bollinger; M Schlumpf
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1976

9.  Pain, thermal sensation and cooling rates of hands while touching cold materials.

Authors:  G Havenith; E J van de Linde; R Heus
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

10.  Finger cooling by contact with cold aluminium surfaces--effects of pressure, mass and whole body thermal balance.

Authors:  F Chen; H Nilsson; I Holmér
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994
View more
  8 in total

1.  Finger skin cooling on contact with cold materials: an investigation of male and female responses during short-term exposures with a view on hand and finger size.

Authors:  O Jay; G Havenith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Differences in conductive foot cooling: a comparison between males and females.

Authors:  Heather Lunt; Michael Tipton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Time, touch and temperature affect perceived finger position and ownership in the grasp illusion.

Authors:  Martin E Héroux; Nicolas Bayle; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The combined effects of local contact force and lower arm cooling upon cutaneous blood cell velocity of the fingertip.

Authors:  Ollie Jay; Matthew D White
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Patients' experiences of cold exposure during ambulance care.

Authors:  Jonas Aléx; Stig Karlsson; Britt-Inger Saveman
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Effect of room temperature on tests for diagnosing vibration-induced white finger: finger rewarming times and finger systolic blood pressures.

Authors:  Ying Ye; Michael J Griffin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Sex differences during a cold-stress test in normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia: A randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Erich Hohenauer; Wolfgang Taube; Livia Freitag; Ron Clijsen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 8.  Responses of the hands and feet to cold exposure.

Authors:  Stephen S Cheung
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-02-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.