Literature DB >> 14605734

[Positron emission tomography for preoperative lymph node diagnosis in esophageal carcinoma].

W Kneist1, M Schreckenberger, P Bartenstein, F Grünwald, K Oberholzer, Th Junginger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exact preoperative staging is a prerequisite for the indication and the choice of appropriate operative technique for patients with esophageal carcinoma. The objective of this prospective study was to assess whether positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) increases the accuracy of preoperative lymph node staging with standard computed tomography (CT) and thus leads to a different surgical approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with carcinoma of the esophagus (46 men and 12 women) with a median age of 61 years underwent FDG-PET imaging of the neck, chest, and abdomen as well as CT of the chest and abdomen. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for both imaging techniques to evaluate the detection of histologically verified lymph node metastases.
RESULTS: The FDG-PET showed higher specificity, whereas CT proved to be more accurate for detecting lymph node metastases not only of the abdomen (73% vs 59%) but also of the thorax (73% vs 63%). Resections were transhiatal in 23 patients and transthoracal in 16. As a supplement to conventional CT diagnostic procedure, FDG-PET was not decisive for the surgical approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, pretherapeutical PET imaging did not increase the accuracy of lymph node staging for our patients with esophageal carcinoma, which had already been defined through CT. Therefore, no new consequences resulted for the surgical procedure. Due to the high costs involved with PET investigation, lymph node staging with it is momentarily indicated mainly for clinical studies and when CT does not offer unequivocal results. Increased sensitivity of the already advantageous whole-body FDG-PET imaging by means of tumor-affinitive radiopharmaceuticals and optimized apparatus resolution could lead to new indications for this staging procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605734     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-003-0711-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  22 in total

Review 1.  [Staging of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The current status of diagnostic imaging].

Authors:  P Pokieser; M Memarsadeghi; M Danzer; R Prokesch; B Partik; E Wenzl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Evaluation of distant metastases in esophageal cancer: 100 consecutive positron emission tomography scans.

Authors:  J D Luketich; D M Friedman; T L Weigel; M A Meehan; R J Keenan; D W Townsend; C C Meltzer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Improved detection of individual nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus by FDG PET.

Authors:  J Y Choi; K H Lee; Y M Shim; K S Lee; J J Kim; S E Kim; B T Kim
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Positron emission tomography of esophageal carcinoma using (11)C-choline and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose: a novel method of preoperative lymph node staging.

Authors:  O Kobori; Y Kirihara; N Kosaka; T Hara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Staging of esophageal carcinoma: comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT.

Authors:  V Vilgrain; D Mompoint; L Palazzo; Y Menu; B Gayet; P Ollier; H Nahum; F Fekete
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  [Spiral computerized tomography of esophageal carcinoma--methodology, problems, results].

Authors:  H U Kauczor; P Mildenberger; A Heintz; F Schweden; H H Schild
Journal:  Aktuelle Radiol       Date:  1994-11

7.  Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Masanobu Nakajima; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Minako Yoshikawa; Hitoshi Ojima; Katsuhiko Tsukada; Noboru Oriuchi; Tomio Inoue; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status.

Authors:  T W Rice; G Zuccaro; D J Adelstein; L A Rybicki; E H Blackstone; J R Goldblum
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Computed tomography and positron emission tomography in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  S C Rankin; H Taylor; G J Cook; R Mason
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Positron emission tomography for staging of oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy.

Authors:  A C Kole; J T Plukker; O E Nieweg; W Vaalburg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography imaging approaches for external beam radiation therapies: current status and future developments.

Authors:  P M Price; M M Green
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.