Literature DB >> 14602388

Comparison of LNS-AmB, a novel low-dose formulation of amphotericin B with lipid nano-sphere (LNS), with commercial lipid-based formulations.

Hiroshi Fukui1, Tomohiro Koike, Takashi Nakagawa, Akira Saheki, Satoru Sonoke, Yoshifumi Tomii, Junzo Seki.   

Abstract

Three lipid-based delivery systems (AmBisome, Amphocil, and Abelcet) for amphotericin B (AmB) have been marketed to overcome the disadvantages associated with the clinical use of AmB. However, to show their efficacy, they need to be administered at higher doses than the conventional dosage form, Fungizone. In this study, we compared LNS-AmB, our new low-dose therapeutic system for AmB using lipid nano-sphere (LNS), with these commercial formulations in terms of their pharmacokinetics and efficacy. The plasma AmB levels yielded by LNS-AmB after intravenous administration to rats were much higher than those yielded by Amphocil or Abelcet, and similar to those yielded by AmBisome, but in dogs LNS-AmB yielded plasma AmB concentrations about three times higher than did AmBisome. In a carrageenin-induced pleurisy model in rats, LNS-AmB yielded AmB levels in the pleural exudate over 20 times those yielded by Amphocil or Abelcet, and similar to those yielded by AmBisome. From these pharmacokinetic results, it is clear that Amphocil and Abelcet are based on a quite distinct drug-delivery concept from LNS-AmB. In a rat model of localized candidiasis, LNS-AmB significantly inhibited the growth of Candida albicans in the pouch, whereas AmBisome did not, even though the AmB concentrations in the pouch were similar. This difference in antifungal activity between LNS-AmB and AmBisome was also found in vitro. That is, the antifungal activity of LNS-AmB against C. albicans was similar to that of Fungizone and dimethyl sulfoxide-solubilized AmB, while AmBisome showed weaker antifungal activity than did other formulations. Based on these results, the release of AmB from AmBisome was judged to be slow and slight. In a mouse model of systemic candidiasis, LNS-AmB (1.0mg/kg) was much more effective than AmBisome (8.0mg/kg) or Fungizone (1.0mg/kg). These results suggest that LNS-AmB maintained the potent activity of AmB against fungal cells even though the AmB was incorporated into LNS particles. We conclude that LNS-AmB may offer an improved therapeutic profile at lower doses than Fungizone and commercial lipid-based formulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14602388     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nanoemulsions in translational research-opportunities and challenges in targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Srinivas Ganta; Meghna Talekar; Amit Singh; Timothy P Coleman; Mansoor M Amiji
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Metabolomics as a tool to evaluate the toxicity of formulations containing amphotericin B, an antileishmanial drug.

Authors:  Délia C M Santos; Marta L Lima; Juliano S Toledo; Paula A Fernandes; Marta M G Aguiar; Ángeles López-Gonzálvez; Lucas A M Ferreira; Ana Paula Fernandes; Coral Barbas
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Amphotericin B is cytotoxic at locally delivered concentrations.

Authors:  Samuel Harmsen; Alex C McLaren; Christine Pauken; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Supramolecular Chitosan Micro-Platelets Synergistically Enhance Anti-Candida albicans Activity of Amphotericin B Using an Immunocompetent Murine Model.

Authors:  Tiphany Grisin; Christian Bories; Martina Bombardi; Philippe M Loiseau; Valérie Rouffiac; Audrey Solgadi; Jean-Maurice Mallet; Gilles Ponchel; Kawthar Bouchemal
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Nanotherapeutics in the EU: an overview on current state and future directions.

Authors:  Anita Hafner; Jasmina Lovrić; Gorana Perina Lakoš; Ivan Pepić
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-02-19

Review 6.  Optimizing efficacy of Amphotericin B through nanomodification.

Authors:  Gillian Barratt; Stéphane Bretagne
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007

Review 7.  Optimizing efficacy of amphotericin B through nanomodification.

Authors:  Suresh P Vyas; Swati Gupta
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.