Literature DB >> 14602362

Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field.

Paul M Corballis1, Gabriele Gratton.   

Abstract

We investigated how the selection of information-processing strategies is organized. We contrasted three alternative ways in which strategies may be controlled: a centralized mechanism, a hemisphere-specific mechanism or a local mechanism. We built on the previous observation that the size of the noise-compatibility effect (flanker effect) is influenced by observers' expectancies for compatible or incompatible arrays. In three experiments, we varied the probabilities of compatible or incompatible noise in different locations of the visual field. We found that observers can adapt their processing strategies, as indicated by changes in the size of the noise-compatibility effect, independently in the left and right hemifields. However, processing of midline stimuli is determined by the expectancies existing in the lateral locations. These data support the notion of a hemisphere- or location-specific selection of processing strategies and suggest that the strategy selection process is not unitary.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14602362     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00109-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  31 in total

1.  Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.

Authors:  Beatriz R Sarmiento; Pawel J Matusz; Daniel Sanabria; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?

Authors:  Caroline Gottschalk; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-05

3.  The conflict adaptation effect: it's not just priming.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Lauren M Bylsma; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Rainer H Kluwe; Ina Vietze
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

5.  On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

6.  Conflict adaptation in time: foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

7.  Strategic behavior without awareness? Effects of implicit learning in the Eriksen flanker paradigm.

Authors:  Rodica Ghinescu; Todd R Schachtman; Michael A Stadler; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

Review 8.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

9.  Cognitive effort is modulated outside of the explicit awareness of conflict frequency: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Selective attention and recognition: effects of congruency on episodic learning.

Authors:  Tamara M Rosner; Maria C D'Angelo; Ellen MacLellan; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.