Literature DB >> 14602130

Clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with liver metastases alone in the anthracycline-taxane era: a retrospective analysis of two prospective, randomised metastatic breast cancer trials.

G Atalay1, L Biganzoli, F Renard, R Paridaens, T Cufer, R Coleman, A H Calvert, T Gamucci, A Minisini, P Therasse, M J Piccart.   

Abstract

Liver metastases have long been known to indicate an unfavourable disease course in breast cancer (BC). However, a small subset of patients with liver metastases alone who were treated with pre-taxane chemotherapy regimens was reported to have longer survival compared with patients with liver and metastases at other sites. In the present study, we examined the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with liver metastases alone in the context of two phase III European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trials which compared the efficacy of doxorubicin (A) versus paclitaxel (T) (trial 10923) and of AC (cyclophosphamide) versus AT (trial 10961), given as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic BC patients. The median follow-up for the patients with liver metastases was 90.5 months in trial 10923 and 56.6 months in trial 10961. Patients with liver metastases alone comprised 18% of all patients with liver metastases, in both the 10923 and 10961 trials. The median survival of patients with liver metastases alone and liver plus other sites of metastases were 22.7 and 14.2 months (log rank test, P=0.002) in trial 10923 and 27.1 and 16.8 months (log rank test, P=0.19) in trial 10961. The median TTP (time to progression) for patients with liver metastases alone was also longer compared with the liver plus other sites of metastases group in both trials: 10.2 versus 8.8 months (log rank test, P=0.02) in trial 10923 and 8.3 versus 6.7 months (log rank test, P=0.37) in trial 10961. Most patients with liver metastases alone have progression of their disease in their liver again (96 and 60% of patients in trials 10923 and 10961, respectively). Given the high prevalence of breast cancer, improved detection of liver metastases, encouraging survival achieved with currently available cytotoxic agents and the fact that a significant portion of patients with liver metastases alone have progression of their tumour in the liver again, a more aggressive multimodality treatment approach through prospective clinical trials seems worth exploring in this specific subset of women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14602130     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00601-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  33 in total

Review 1.  [Multimodality treatment concepts for metastatic breast cancer].

Authors:  V Heinemann; S Kahlert; H-J Stemmler
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Combined Chemotherapy with Mitomycin C, Folinic Acid, and 5-Fluorouracil (MiFoFU) as Salvage Treatment for Patients with Liver Metastases from Breast Cancer - a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Michael H R Eichbaum; Anne-Sybil Gast; Thomas Bruckner; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christof Sohn
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  One shot of carbon-ion radiotherapy cured a 6-cm chemo-resistant metastatic liver tumor: a case of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mayumi Harada; Kumiko Karasawa; Shigeo Yasuda; Tadashi Kamada; Kenji Nemoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Yttrium-90 radioembolization stops progression of targeted breast cancer liver metastases after failed chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrew C Gordon; William J Gradishar; Virginia G Kaklamani; Avesh J Thuluvath; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Vanessa L Gates; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  A comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus systemic therapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer metastasis to the liver.

Authors:  Yunus Taşçi; Erol Aksoy; Halit Eren Taşkın; Shamil Aliyev; Halle Moore; Orhan Ağcaoğlu; Onur Birsen; Allan Siperstein; Eren Berber
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases from Breast and Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Ramona Gupta; Neil Sheth; Andrew C Gordon; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  The role of liver resection in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review examining the survival impact.

Authors:  Sadia Tasleem; Jarlath C Bolger; Michael E Kelly; Michael R Boland; Dermot Bowden; Karl J Sweeney; Carmel Malone
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  In vivo evidence for the role of CD44s in promoting breast cancer metastasis to the liver.

Authors:  Allal Ouhtit; Zakaria Y Abd Elmageed; Mohamed E Abdraboh; Tong F Lioe; Madhwa H G Raj
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Oligometastatic breast cancer: a shift from palliative to potentially curative treatment?

Authors:  Simona Di Lascio; Olivia Pagani
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  PAR1 is selectively over expressed in high grade breast cancer patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Norma A Hernández; Elma Correa; Esther P Avila; Teresa A Vela; Víctor M Pérez
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.