Literature DB >> 14601745

Bacterial recovery from breast skin of genetically feathered and featherless broiler carcasses immediately following scalding and picking.

R J Buhr1, M E Berrang, J A Cason.   

Abstract

Genetically feathered and featherless sibling broilers selected for matched BW were killed, scalded, and defeathered to determine the consequences of feathers and empty feather follicles on the recovery of bacteria from carcass breast skin. In trial 1, the vents of all carcasses were plugged and sutured before scalding to prevent the expulsion of cloacal contents during picking. In trial 2, half of the carcasses had their vents plugged and sutured. Immediately after defeathering, breast skin was aseptically removed, and bacteria associated with it were enumerated. In trial 1, the levels of bacteria recovered did not differ between feathered and featherless carcasses: Campylobacter log10 1.4 cfu/mL of rinse, coliform log10 1.8, Escherichia coli log10 1.6, and total aerobic bacteria log10 3.1. In trial 2, the carcasses that had vents plugged and sutured had lower levels of all four types of bacteria (differences of Campylobacter log10 0.7 cfu/mL, coliform log10 1.8, E. coli log10 1.7, and total aerobic bacteria log10 0.5) than those carcasses with open vents. The lower levels of bacteria recovered from carcasses with the vents plugged and sutured during picking enabled detection of small but significant differences between feathered and featherless carcasses. The level of coliform and E. coli recovered was slightly higher by log10 0.7 cfu for feathered carcasses, but featherless carcasses had marginally higher levels of total aerobic bacteria by log10 0.4 cfu. Feathered and featherless carcasses with open vents during picking did not differ in the levels of recovery of coliform, E. coli, and total aerobic bacteria from breast skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14601745     DOI: 10.1093/ps/82.10.1641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Baseline data from a Belgium-wide survey of Campylobacter species contamination in chicken meat preparations and considerations for a reliable monitoring program.

Authors:  Ihab Habib; Imca Sampers; Mieke Uyttendaele; Dirk Berkvens; Lieven De Zutter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Management Strategies for Prevention of Campylobacter Infections Through the Poultry Food Chain: A European Perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Alter; Felix Reich
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Reviewing Interventions against Enterobacteriaceae in Broiler Processing: Using Old Techniques for Meeting the New Challenges of ESBL E. coli?

Authors:  Michaela Projahn; Ewa Pacholewicz; Evelyne Becker; Guido Correia-Carreira; Niels Bandick; Annemarie Kaesbohrer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Effect of morphological changes in feather follicles of chicken carcasses after defeathering and chilling on the degree of skin contamination by Campylobacter species.

Authors:  Khin Maung Latt; Ayaka Urata; Taisuke Shinki; Satomi Sasaki; Takako Taniguchi; Naoaki Misawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Sources of contamination, prevalence, and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from turkeys.

Authors:  Radia Bouhamed; Leila Bouayad; Sara Messad; Safia Zenia; Malek Naïm; Taha-Mossadak Hamdi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-08-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.