Literature DB >> 1460160

An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.

J S Baer1, G A Marlatt, D R Kivlahan, K Fromme, M E Larimer, E Williams.   

Abstract

This study tested 3 forms of alcohol risk reduction programming for young adults. Volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a 6-week class and discussion group, a 6-unit self-help manual, or a single 1-hr feedback and advice session with professional staff. Results reveal significant reductions in self-reported drinking at the end of the intervention phase and maintenance of drinking changes throughout a 2-year follow-up period. Comparable drinking reductions were rated across treatments; however, noncompliance with the self-help reading program suggested limited utility. Treatment response was related to subject age, as subjects showed increased drinking during the year they reached legal drinking status. The efficacy of brief motivational interventions and client matching in prevention programs is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1460160     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.60.6.974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  54 in total

1.  Alcohol-Related Information in Multi-Component Interventions and College Students' Drinking Behavior.

Authors:  Vandana Thadani; Karen Huchting; Joseph LaBrie
Journal:  J Alcohol Drug Educ       Date:  2009-08

2.  Mailed feedback reduces consumption among moderate drinkers who are employed.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; W Gill Woodall
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2003-12

3.  Normative Feedback and Adolescent Readiness to Change: A Small Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Douglas C Smith; Jordan P Davis; Daniel J Ureche; Karen M Tabb
Journal:  Res Soc Work Pract       Date:  2014-07-01

4.  Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2005-09

Review 5.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Reducing heavy drinking in college males with the decisional balance: analyzing an element of Motivational Interviewing.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Eric R Pedersen; Mitch Earleywine; Hutson Olsen
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 7.  Heavy drinking in college students: who is at risk and what is being done about it?

Authors:  Rob Turrisi; Kimberly A Mallett; Nadine R Mastroleo; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2006-10

Review 8.  Individual and situational factors that influence the efficacy of personalized feedback substance use interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Eun Young Mun; Helene R White; Thomas J Morgan
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

9.  Alcohol interventions for mandated students: behavioral outcomes from a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Diane E Logan; Jason R Kilmer; Kevin M King; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample.

Authors:  Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Heather A LaChance; Angela Bryan; Kent E Hutchison
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.