Literature DB >> 14601187

Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays.

A Posselt1, T Kerschbaum.   

Abstract

In a dental practice, 2328 ceramic inlays were placed in 794 patients. The restorations were manufactured chairside using Cerec technology and adhesively inserted at the same appointment. The clinical performance of the restorations was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The probability of survival was 95.5% after 9 years; 35 Cerec restorations were judged as failures. The prognosis for success was not significantly influenced by restoration size, tooth vitality, treatment of caries profunda (CP), type of tooth treated, or whether the restoration was located in the maxilla or mandible. The most common type of failure was the extraction of a tooth. In a clinical follow-up light-microscopic examination of 44 randomly selected restorations, an average composite joint width of 236.3 microns was found. 45.1% of the restorations exhibited a perfect margin, and 47.4% of the investigated joint sections showed underfilled margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14601187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Dent        ISSN: 1463-4201            Impact factor:   1.883


  10 in total

1.  Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth.

Authors:  Matthias J Roggendorf; Bianka Kunzi; Johannes Ebert; Hubert C Roggendorf; Roland Frankenberger; Sven M Reich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Julia Hehn; Jan Hajtó; Norbert Krämer; Michael Naumann; Andreas Koch; Matthias J Roggendorf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.

Authors:  María José Sandoval; Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Ivo Krejci; Michael Mandikos; Didier Dietschi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  CEREC CAD/CAM Chairside System.

Authors:  G Sannino; F Germano; L Arcuri; E Bigelli; C Arcuri; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2015-04-13

5.  Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays.

Authors:  Vijaya Kumar Rajamani; Sandeep Singh Reyal; Eraiah Mahesh Gowda; Muttige Parameshwara Shashidhar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep

6.  Examination of the Position Accuracy of Implant Abutments Reproduced by Intra-Oral Optical Impression.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ajioka; Hidemichi Kihara; Chikayuki Odaira; Takuya Kobayashi; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resin Composite Materials for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations: A Comparison of Selected Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Wojciech Grzebieluch; Marcin Mikulewicz; Urszula Kaczmarek
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 8.  Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of ceramic and resin inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Vishal B Naik; Ashish K Jain; Rahul D Rao; Balaram D Naik
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-07-05

9.  Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Emir Yuzbasioglu; Hanefi Kurt; Rana Turunc; Halenur Bilir
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.