BACKGROUND: The effect of adenosine and exercise on gated SPET left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic volume (EDV) and end systolic volume (ESV) has not been fully investigated. The aim of the study was to compare functional measurements obtained in one-day adenosine rest and two-day stress-rest protocols in relation to ischaemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of 226 consecutive patients examined with submaximal treadmill stress-rest 700 MBq Tc-99m MIBI, 26 were chosen to match those subjected toadenosine (140 micro g/kg/min) enhanced by a low level exercise protocol (300 MBq and 700 MBq Tc-99m tetrofosmin for stress and rest respectively). All images were acquired on a double head system and were gated using 8 frames, 25 s per frame. RESULTS:ED and ES volumes increased after adenosine but decreased after treadmill resulting in the post-stress LVEF being significantly greater than after adenosine, 60 +/- 11 v. 51 +/- 13% (p < 0.01). This was caused by the smaller post-stress ESV in the treadmill group 40 +/- 20 v. 51 +/- 34, p < 0.05. In non-ischaemic scans the LVEF was greater (61 +/- 8 v. 51 +/- 14, p < 0.01) and EDV and ESV smaller after both stress and rest. CONCLUSIONS: The adenosine test may have an opposite influence on the EDV and ESV in comparison to the submaximal treadmill test and therefore the left ventricular function measurements after adenosine infusion should be interpreted carefully and may not represent those acquired after physical exercise. In the gated SPET scans showing ischaemia the post-stress EDV and ESV may be greater and the LVEF lower than at rest.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The effect of adenosine and exercise on gated SPET left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic volume (EDV) and end systolic volume (ESV) has not been fully investigated. The aim of the study was to compare functional measurements obtained in one-day adenosine rest and two-day stress-rest protocols in relation to ischaemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of 226 consecutive patients examined with submaximal treadmill stress-rest 700 MBq Tc-99mMIBI, 26 were chosen to match those subjected to adenosine (140 micro g/kg/min) enhanced by a low level exercise protocol (300 MBq and 700 MBq Tc-99mtetrofosmin for stress and rest respectively). All images were acquired on a double head system and were gated using 8 frames, 25 s per frame. RESULTS: ED and ES volumes increased after adenosine but decreased after treadmill resulting in the post-stress LVEF being significantly greater than after adenosine, 60 +/- 11 v. 51 +/- 13% (p < 0.01). This was caused by the smaller post-stress ESV in the treadmill group 40 +/- 20 v. 51 +/- 34, p < 0.05. In non-ischaemic scans the LVEF was greater (61 +/- 8 v. 51 +/- 14, p < 0.01) and EDV and ESV smaller after both stress and rest. CONCLUSIONS: The adenosine test may have an opposite influence on the EDV and ESV in comparison to the submaximal treadmill test and therefore the left ventricular function measurements after adenosine infusion should be interpreted carefully and may not represent those acquired after physical exercise. In the gated SPET scans showing ischaemia the post-stress EDV and ESV may be greater and the LVEF lower than at rest.
Authors: Won Woo Lee; Eun Kyung Park; Jae Seon Eo; Sang Woo Lee; Cheol Ho Kim; Young So; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Myung Chul Lee; Sang Eun Kim Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 2.357