Literature DB >> 14600601

Diagnosis of occult bone metastases: positron emission tomography.

Jeffrey J Peterson1, Mark J Kransdorf, Mary I O'Connor.   

Abstract

The current standard of practice for the detection of osseous metastatic disease is the conventional bone scan of the entire body using technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (Tc-99m MDP). Although Tc-99m MDP scintigraphy is sensitive for the detection of advanced skeletal metastatic lesions, early involvement may be missed because this technique relies on the identification of the osteoblastic reaction of the involved bone rather than the detection the tumor itself. Positron emission tomography (PET) has proven to be the gold standard in metabolic imaging. Fluorine -18 deoxyglucose (FDG) provides a means of quantitating the glucose metabolism, with the amount of tracer accumulation reflecting the glucose metabolism: high-grade malignancies tend to have higher rates of glycolysis than do low-grade malignancies and benign lesions; therefore, high-grade malignancies have greater uptake of FDG than that of low-grade or benign lesions. Positron emission tomography has been shown to be superior to scintigraphy in the detection of metastases because it detects the presence of tumor directly by metabolic activity, rather than indirectly by showing tumor involvement due to increased bone mineral turnover. This has allowed the detection of metastatic foci earlier with PET than with bone scintigraphy. Although the spectrum of PET applications is unknown, it now is approved for the diagnosis, staging and restaging of many common malignancies and has shown efficacy for the detection of osseous metastasis from several malignancies including lung carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and lymphoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14600601     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093051.96273.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary imaging modalities for the surveillance of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew K Tollefson; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  An osteoclast-targeting agent for imaging and therapy of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Asghar Hajibeigi; Mai Lin; Cynthia L Rostollan; Zoltan Kovacs; Orhan K Oz; Xiankai Sun
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Functional imaging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Ian D Davis; Damien M Bolton; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Advances in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Staging and Radiotherapy Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Drew Moghanaki; Baris Turkbey; Neha Vapiwala; Behfar Ehdaie; Steven J Frank; Patrick W McLaughlin; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  Metastasis to nervous system: spinal epidural and intramedullary metastases.

Authors:  Melike Mut; David Schiff; Mark E Shaffrey
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Takako Nakai; Chio Okuyama; Takao Kubota; Kei Yamada; Yo Ushijima; Keiko Taniike; Takako Suzuki; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Integrin α(v)β₃ as a PET imaging biomarker for osteoclast number in mouse models of negative and positive osteoclast regulation.

Authors:  Alexander Zheleznyak; Thaddeus J Wadas; Christopher D Sherman; Jessica M Wilson; Paul J Kostenuik; Katherine N Weilbaecher; Carolyn J Anderson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Current molecular imaging of spinal tumors in clinical practice.

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Gabriele Pöpperl; Marie-Elisabeth Toubert; Toma Spiriev; Belachew Arasho; Mikael Orabi; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 9.  The choice of the correct imaging modality in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The role of whole-body FDG PET/CT, Tc 99m MDP bone scintigraphy, and serum alkaline phosphatase in detecting bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Won Min; Sang-Won Um; Jae-Jun Yim; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Sung Koo Han; Young-Soo Shim; Young Whan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.