OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence rate of temporal peritumoral enhancement associated with hepatic cavernous hemangiomas and to correlate that with the speed of intratumoral contrast enhancement and tumor volume. METHODS: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 69 consecutive patients with 136 hemangiomas was reviewed for peritumoral enhancement. Tumor volume was estimated by the largest diameter on T2-weighted images. Speed of intratumoral contrast enhancement was determined by portal phase image and was categorized as rapid (>75% of tumor volume), intermediate (25%-75% of tumor volume), or slow (<25% of tumor volume). RESULTS: Temporal peritumoral enhancement was found in 37 (26.6%) of 136 hemangiomas. It was more common in hemangiomas with rapid enhancement (30 of 67 cases [44.8%]) than in those with intermediate (3 of 22 cases [13.6%]) and slow (4 of 47 cases [8.5%]) enhancement (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant relation between lesion size and presence of temporal peritumoral enhancement (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal peritumoral enhancement is not uncommonly seen in hepatic cavernous hemangiomas at dynamic MRI. It is most commonly encountered in rapidly enhancing small lesions. There is no statistically significant relation between temporal peritumoral enhancement and tumor volume, however.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence rate of temporal peritumoral enhancement associated with hepatic cavernous hemangiomas and to correlate that with the speed of intratumoral contrast enhancement and tumor volume. METHODS: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 69 consecutive patients with 136 hemangiomas was reviewed for peritumoral enhancement. Tumor volume was estimated by the largest diameter on T2-weighted images. Speed of intratumoral contrast enhancement was determined by portal phase image and was categorized as rapid (>75% of tumor volume), intermediate (25%-75% of tumor volume), or slow (<25% of tumor volume). RESULTS: Temporal peritumoral enhancement was found in 37 (26.6%) of 136 hemangiomas. It was more common in hemangiomas with rapid enhancement (30 of 67 cases [44.8%]) than in those with intermediate (3 of 22 cases [13.6%]) and slow (4 of 47 cases [8.5%]) enhancement (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant relation between lesion size and presence of temporal peritumoral enhancement (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal peritumoral enhancement is not uncommonly seen in hepatic cavernous hemangiomas at dynamic MRI. It is most commonly encountered in rapidly enhancing small lesions. There is no statistically significant relation between temporal peritumoral enhancement and tumor volume, however.