Literature DB >> 14600425

How accurate and safe is the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy by means of commercial skin prick test reagents?

Jaap H Akkerdaas1, Marjolein Wensing, André C Knulst, Monika Krebitz, Heimo Breiteneder, Sacco de Vries, André H Penninks, Rob C Aalberse, Sue L Hefle, Ronald van Ree.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergy to tree nuts, like hazelnuts, ranks among the most frequently observed food allergies. These allergies can start at early childhood and are, in contrast to other food allergies, not always outgrown by the patient. Tree nut allergy is frequently associated with severe reactions. Diagnosis partially relies on in vivo testing by means of a skin prick test (SPT) using commercially available SPT reagents.
METHODS: Protein and allergen composition of nine commercial SPT solutions was evaluated using standard protein detection methods and specific immunoassays for measurement of five individual allergens. Diagnostic performance was assessed by SPT in 30 hazelnut-allergic subjects, of which 15 were provocation proven.
RESULTS: Protein concentrations ranged from 0.2-14 mg/ml. SDS-PAGE/silver staining revealed clear differences in protein composition. The major allergen Cor a 1 was present in all extracts but concentrations differed up to a factor 50. An allergen associated with severe symptoms, Cor a 8 (lipid transfer protein), was not detected on immunoblot in three products, and concentrations varied by more than a factor 100 as was shown by RAST inhibition. Similar observations were made for profilin, thaumatin-like protein and a not fully characterized 38-kD allergen. Ratios of individual allergens were variable among the nine extracts. SPT showed significant difference, and 6/30 patients displayed false-negative results using 3/9 products.
CONCLUSION: Variability in the composition of products for the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy is extreme. Sometimes, allergens implicated in severe anaphylaxis are not detected by immunoblotting. These shortcomings in standardisation and quality control can potentially cause a false-negative diagnosis in subjects at risk of severe reactions to hazelnuts. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14600425     DOI: 10.1159/000073714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1018-2438            Impact factor:   2.749


  10 in total

Review 1.  Microarrayed allergen molecules for the diagnosis of allergic diseases.

Authors:  Adriano Mari; Claudia Alessandri; Maria Livia Bernardi; Rosetta Ferrara; Enrico Scala; Danila Zennaro
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Ara h 6 complements Ara h 2 as an important marker for IgE reactivity to peanut.

Authors:  Audrey E Koid; Martin D Chapman; Robert G Hamilton; Ronald van Ree; Serge A Versteeg; Stephen C Dreskin; Stef J Koppelman; Sabina Wünschmann
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Oil body-associated hazelnut allergens including oleosins are underrepresented in diagnostic extracts but associated with severe symptoms.

Authors:  Laurian Zuidmeer-Jongejan; Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Marcel Gt Winter; Jaap H Akkerdaas; Colin Summers; Ans Lebens; André C Knulst; Piet Schilte; Peter Briza; Gabriele Gadermaier; Ronald van Ree
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 4.  Molecular approach to allergy diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Fatima Ferreira; Martin Wolf; Michael Wallner
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 5.  Hazelnut Allergy.

Authors:  Elisabetta Calamelli; Alessia Trozzo; Elisabetta Di Blasi; Laura Serra; Paolo Bottau
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  The influence of recombinant production on the immunologic behavior of birch pollen isoallergens.

Authors:  Michael Wallner; Martin Himly; Angela Neubauer; Anja Erler; Michael Hauser; Claudia Asam; Sonja Mutschlechner; Christof Ebner; Peter Briza; Fatima Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Molecular allergology approach to allergic diseases in the paediatric age.

Authors:  Claudia Alessandri; Danila Zennaro; Alessandra Zaffiro; Adriano Mari
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.

Authors:  Hjalte H Andersen; Anna Charlotte Lundgaard; Anne S Petersen; Lise E Hauberg; Neha Sharma; Sofie D Hansen; Jesper Elberling; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Allergen Extracts for In Vivo Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergy: Is There a Future?

Authors:  Rudolf Valenta; Alexander Karaulov; Verena Niederberger; Yury Zhernov; Olga Elisyutina; Raffaela Campana; Margarete Focke-Tejkl; Mirela Curin; Leyla Namazova-Baranova; Jiu-Yao Wang; Ruby Pawankar; Musa Khaitov
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-10-05

10.  Development of a protein microarray-based diagnostic chip mimicking the skin prick test for allergy diagnosis.

Authors:  Marina Kalli; Andrew Blok; Long Jiang; Nichola Starr; Marcos J C Alcocer; Franco H Falcone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.