Literature DB >> 14599760

Detection of systemic hypersensitivity to drugs using standard guinea pig assays.

James L Weaver1, David Staten, Joslyn Swann, George Armstrong, Melissa Bates, Kenneth L Hastings.   

Abstract

The most commonly used assays designed to detect either skin or systemic immune-based hypersensitivity reactions are those using guinea pigs (GP). We obtained data from various FDA records to evaluate the correlation between GP assay results and reported post-marketing systemic hypersensitivity reactions. We examined the new drug application (NDA) reviews of approved drugs for the results of GP assays. Post-marketing human data were extracted from the FDA adverse event reporting system (AERS). Drug usage data were obtained from a commercial database maintained by IMS Health Inc. We found 83 (21%) of 396 drugs approved between 1978 and 1998 had reported GP test results. Among these 83 drugs, 14 (17%) were found to have positive results in at least one GP assay. Simple reporting index (RI) values for systemic hypersensitivity reactions were calculated from AERS data and usage to produce the index of adverse event reports per million shipping units of drug. A variety of definitions of positive human response were examined. A statistically significant association was seen for rash between post-marketing and clinical trials adverse event reports. No statistically significant associations between human data and GP test results were observed. These data suggest that standard GP assays have limited ability to predict human systemic hypersensitivity potential for pharmaceuticals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599760     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00267-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  5 in total

Review 1.  Immunotoxicology: role in the safety assessment of drugs.

Authors:  Jacques Descotes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Animal models and conserved processes.

Authors:  Ray Greek; Mark J Rice
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 3.  The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling.

Authors:  Ray Greek; Annalea Pippus; Lawrence A Hansen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 4.  Human Clinical Relevance of the Porcine Model of Pseudoallergic Infusion Reactions.

Authors:  János Szebeni; Raj Bawa
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2020-04-08

Review 5.  Systematic reviews of animal models: methodology versus epistemology.

Authors:  Ray Greek; Andre Menache
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.