Literature DB >> 14599758

Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgments about moral and response-dependent properties.

Shaun Nichols1, Trisha Folds-Bennett.   

Abstract

Researchers working on children's moral understanding maintain that the child's capacity to distinguish morality from convention shows that children regard moral violations as objectively wrong (e.g. Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). However, one traditional way to cast the issue of objectivism is to focus not on conventionality, but on whether moral properties depend on our responses, as with properties like icky and fun. This paper argues that the moral/conventional task is inadequate for assessing whether children regard moral properties as response-dependent. Unfortunately, children's understanding of response-dependent properties has been neglected in recent research. Two experiments are reported showing that children are more likely to treat properties like fun and icky as response-dependent than moral properties like good and bad. Hence, this helps support the claim that children are moral objectivists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599758     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00160-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

1.  Children's developing notions of (im)partiality.

Authors:  Candice M Mills; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-20

2.  Moralized Rationality: Relying on Logic and Evidence in the Formation and Evaluation of Belief Can Be Seen as a Moral Issue.

Authors:  Tomas Ståhl; Maarten P Zaal; Linda J Skitka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Empirical research on folk moral objectivism.

Authors:  Thomas Pölzler; Jennifer Cole Wright
Journal:  Philos Compass       Date:  2019-07-05

4.  Whose mind matters more--the agent or the artist? An investigation of ethical and aesthetic evaluations.

Authors:  Angelina Hawley-Dolan; Liane Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Revisiting Folk Moral Realism.

Authors:  Thomas Pölzler
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01

6.  How to Measure Moral Realism.

Authors:  Thomas Pölzler
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2018-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.