Literature DB >> 14599449

A review of in vitro methods to assess the biological activity of tobacco smoke with the aim of reducing the toxicity of smoke.

Cristina Andreoli1, Daniela Gigante, Alfredo Nunziata.   

Abstract

In the last few years tobacco companies have been developing several research strategies in order to reduce the risks associated with smoking. These strategies include, for example, the refining of alternative cigarette designs that reduce the amount of hazardous chemicals in the mainstream smoke by introducing modified filters, and/or reducing the amount of biologically significant ingredients in tobacco-burning cigarettes. In the last few decades numerous studies have been published to assess the biological activity of tobacco smoke using in vivo and in vitro test systems. In this scenario a general scientific consensus on how to measure and characterize the risk associated with cigarette smoke is still lacking. Short-term in vitro assays, which are widely accepted by regulatory agencies around the world, are useful tools to evaluate both the biological activity and the progress towards a reduction of tobacco smoke toxicity. These assays could be mainly applied to evaluate cytotoxicity and genotoxicity properties on whole cigarette smoke as well as condensates or fractions of whole smoke. Cytotoxicity induction can be measured as cellular viability and growth rates using different end-points. Otherwise, the target of genotoxicity studies is the DNA molecule. For genotoxicity evaluation, the end-points and cell systems should be chosen from those that are relevant and appropriate as clinical surrogate markers. In this respect, the occurrence of early biological effect markers, such as mutational or clastogenic events (point mutations, frameshifts, micronuclei, SCE, DNA adducts) in bacterial and mammalian cells should be studied in a tiered approach following the guidelines of regulatory agencies. The choice of criteria shall be matter of discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599449     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(03)00091-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Synthesis of sulfur karrikin bioisosteres as potential neuroprotectives.

Authors:  Martin Pošta; Václav Zima; Lenka Poštová Slavětínská; Marika Matoušová; Petr Beier
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.544

Review 3.  Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Baitang Ning; Zhenqiang Su; Nan Mei; Huixiao Hong; Helen Deng; Leming Shi; James C Fuscoe; William H Tolleson
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  The in vitro toxicology of Swedish snus.

Authors:  Christopher R E Coggins; Mark Ballantyne; Margareta Curvall; Lars-Erik Rutqvist
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Cigarette smoke induces genetic instability in airway epithelial cells by suppressing FANCD2 expression.

Authors:  L E Hays; D M Zodrow; J E Yates; M E Deffebach; D B Jacoby; S B Olson; J F Pankow; G C Bagby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis.

Authors:  David Thorne; Joanne Kilford; Rebecca Payne; Jason Adamson; Ken Scott; Annette Dalrymple; Clive Meredith; Deborah Dillon
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Development, qualification, validation and application of the Ames test using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system.

Authors:  Kathy Fowler; Wanda Fields; Victoria Hargreaves; Lesley Reeve; Betsy Bombick
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-04-12

8.  Development of a BALB/c 3T3 neutral red uptake cytotoxicity test using a mainstream cigarette smoke exposure system.

Authors:  David Thorne; Joanne Kilford; Rebecca Payne; Linsey Haswell; Annette Dalrymple; Clive Meredith; Deborah Dillon
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-06-17

9.  A comparative assessment of cigarette smoke aerosols using an in vitro air-liquid interface cytotoxicity test.

Authors:  David Thorne; Annette Dalrymple; Deborah Dillon; Martin Duke; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Predicting the Cytotoxic Potency of Cigarette Smoke by Assessing the Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitory Capacity of Cigarette Smoke Extract.

Authors:  Longjie Zhang; Min Ning; Yingbo Xu; Chenghui Wang; Guangshan Zhao; Qingqing Cao; Jinsong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.