Literature DB >> 14598195

Effects of body mass index on the accuracy of an electronic pedometer.

A M Swartz1, D R Bassett, J B Moore, D L Thompson, S J Strath.   

Abstract

Electronic pedometers are accurate for assessing steps taken while walking in normal weight adults but the accuracy of these devices has not been tested in overweight and obese men and women. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of an electronic pedometer for measuring steps taken at various walking speeds in groups of adults with variations in body mass index (BMI). The secondary purpose was to determine if the manufacturer recommended position is the best placement position for overweight and obese adults. Participants were categorized into one of three BMI categories identified by the World Health Organization: normal (N = 25; < 25 kg x m(-2)), overweight (N = 24; 25 - 29.9 kg x m(-2)), or obese (N = 17; > or = 30 kg x m(-2)). Participants walked on a treadmill for 3 min at 54, 67, 80, 94, and 107 m x min(-1) for a total of 15 min. During the treadmill walking, three electronic pedometers tallied steps taken. The pedometers were placed at the waist level, one on the anterior mid-line of the thigh (front; manufacturer recommended placement), one on the mid-axillary line (side), and one on the posterior mid-line of the thigh (back). Concurrently, a researcher counted steps using a hand-tally counter. Category of BMI did not affect the accuracy of the pedometer at any walking speed (54 m x min(-1), p = 0.991; 67 m x min(-1), p = 0.556; 80 m x min(-1), p = 0.591; 94 m x min(-1), p = 0.426; 107 m x min(-1), p = 0.869). At 54 m x min(-1), the front, side, and back pedometers significantly underestimated hand-tally counted steps by 20 % (p < 0.001), 33 % (p < 0.001), and 26 % (p < 0.001), respectively. At 67 m x min(-1) the front, side, and back pedometers significantly underestimated hand-tally counted steps by 7 % (p = 0.027), 13 % (p < 0.001), 11 % (p = 0.002), respectively. The steps recorded by the electronic pedometers placed at the front, side and back of the waist were not significantly different than steps counted by the hand-tally counter at speeds of 80 m x min(-1) and higher for all subjects combined. An electronic pedometer accurately quantified steps walked at speeds of 80 m x min(-1) or faster in persons with a normal BMI and those classified as overweight or obese. The placement of the pedometer on the front, side or back of the waistband did not affect accuracy of the pedometer for counting steps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14598195     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-43272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  18 in total

1.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking.

Authors:  C G Ryan; P M Grant; W W Tigbe; M H Granat
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Pedometer accuracy during stair climbing and bench stepping exercises.

Authors:  Makoto Ayabe; Junichiro Aoki; Kojiro Ishii; Kohsaku Takayama; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Validity of Physical Activity Monitors in Assessing Energy Expenditure in Normal, Overweight, and Obese Adults.

Authors:  Ann M Swartz; Scott J Strath; Nora E Miller; Elizabeth K Grimm; Lauren A Ewalt; Michael S Loy; Keith P Gennuso
Journal:  Open Sports Sci J       Date:  2009

4.  Pedometer accuracy in slow walking older adults.

Authors:  Jessica B Martin; Katarina M Krč; Emily A Mitchell; Janice J Eng; Jeremy W Noble
Journal:  Int J Ther Rehabil       Date:  2012-07-03

5.  A pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating motivationally matched pedometer feedback to increase physical activity behavior in older adults.

Authors:  Scott J Strath; Ann M Swartz; Sarah J Parker; Nora E Miller; Elizabeth K Grimm; Susan E Cashin
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-09

6.  Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Lesley Lutes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Physical activity levels in American-Indian adults: the Strong Heart Family Study.

Authors:  Kristi L Storti; Vincent C Arena; M Michael Barmada; Clareann H Bunker; Robert L Hanson; Sandra L Laston; Jeun-Liang Yeh; Joseph M Zmuda; Barbara V Howard; Andrea M Kriska
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  An online social network to increase walking in dog owners: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kristin L Schneider; Deirdra Murphy; Cynthia Ferrara; Jessica Oleski; Emily Panza; Clara Savage; Kimberly Gada; Brianne Bozzella; Effie Olendzki; Daniel Kern; Stephenie C Lemon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  The effects of intermittent exercise on physiological outcomes in an obese population: continuous versus interval walking.

Authors:  Leanne Campbell; Karen Wallman; Danny Green
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Physical activity levels of patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study.

Authors:  Wendy C King; Steven H Belle; George M Eid; Gregory F Dakin; William B Inabnet; James E Mitchell; Emma J Patterson; Anita P Courcoulas; David R Flum; William H Chapman; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.