Literature DB >> 14597944

False-positive exercise echocardiograms: impact of sex and blood pressure response.

Joon-Han Shin1, Takahiro Shiota, Yong-Jin Kim, Jun Kwan, Jian Xin Qin, Yoko Eto, L Leonardo Rodriguez, James D Thomas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors related to false-positive results of exercise echocardiography (ExE) to diagnose coronary disease have not been extensively studied. In addition, previous studies were performed before routine use of digital and tissue harmonic imaging. We evaluated the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of false-positive results during ExE.
METHODS: Four hundred sixty-four patients who had both coronary angiography and ExE were enrolled retrospectively. Significant coronary disease was defined by stenoses > or =50% lumen diameter.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight (13%) had false-positive results. Thirty-one (53%) of these patients were women, which was significantly higher than the percentage of women (25%) in the true-positive group (P <.001). Average peak systolic blood pressure (BP) in the false-positive group was significantly higher than in the true-positive group. Test specificity was decreased at higher levels of BP without change of sensitivity. Men demonstrated a decrease in specificity at peak systolic BP > or =200 mm Hg, whereas women showed a sharp decrease in specificity at BP > or =180 mm Hg. Wall motion score index (WMSI) after peak exercise and the proportion of high- and intermediate-risk patients according to Duke score were significantly lower in the false-positive than in the true-positive group.
CONCLUSIONS: The factors predictive of false-positive results during ExE to diagnose coronary disease were female sex, higher BP at peak exercise, lower risk by Duke score and lower number of abnormal segments and wall motion score index after peak exercise. Women appear to be susceptible to wall motion abnormalities caused by elevated exercise BP. These variables should be considered in the interpretation of ExE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597944     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  Frequency, Predictors, and Implications of Abnormal Blood Pressure Responses During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography.

Authors:  Sara Abram; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Jae K Oh; Alberto Milan; Mohamed M Abidian; Robert B McCully
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  Stress induced hypertensive response: should it be evaluated more carefully?

Authors:  Nagehan Kucukler; Fatih Yalçin; Theodore P Abraham; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.062

3.  Treadmill exercise stress echocardiography in patients with no history of coronary artery disease: a single-center experience in korean population.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Jang; Il Suk Sohn; Jong Nim Kim; Jeong Hwan Park; Chang Bum Park; Eun Sun Jin; Jin Man Cho; Chong Jin Kim; Jong Hoa Bae
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  False-positive Stress Echocardiography: Not as Simple as It Looks.

Authors:  In Jeong Cho
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.