Literature DB >> 14597647

Neither perceived job stress nor individual cardiovascular reactivity predict high blood pressure.

Jean Pierre Fauvel1, Ignasse M'Pio, Pierre Quelin, Jean-Pierre Rigaud, Maurice Laville, Michel Ducher.   

Abstract

We have reported that high job strain was associated with a significantly higher diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 4.5 mm Hg during the working hours, irrespective of BP reactivity to a stress test. We report the final results of the first 5-year follow-up study, which aimed to assess the respective influences of perception of professional strain and cardiovascular reactivity to a mental stress test on BP. A cohort of 292 healthy subjects (mean+/-SEM age, 38+/-1 years) was followed up for progression to hypertension outcome, which was defined as an increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or DBP >7 mm Hg or a DBP >95 mm Hg during follow-up. None of the subjects was lost to follow-up, and 209 subjects completed the study. The high-strain (HS) group, representing 20.9% of the subjects, was compared with the remaining subjects (non-high-strain [NHS]). Similarly, the subjects with the highest BP stress reactivity (HR; 20.9% of subjects) were compared with the remaining subjects (NHR). Progression to hypertension was reached by 93 subjects (31.8%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates revealed that neither HS nor HR increased the incidence of progression to hypertension. End-of-follow-up 24-hour ambulatory BPs that were similar in HS and NHS (120+/-2 vs 120+/-1 mm Hg, respectively) and in HR and NHR (122+/-2 vs 120+/-1 mm Hg, respectively) confirmed our findings. Age, alcohol, salt diet, body mass index, and occupation did not interfere with our results. In conclusion, cardiovascular HR and HS do not appear to be major risk markers for future high BP in healthy, young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597647     DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000102862.93418.EE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  18 in total

1.  Knowledge and prevalence of risk factors for arterial hypertension and blood pressure pattern among bankers and traffic wardens in Ilorin, Nigeria.

Authors:  A G Salaudeen; O I Musa; O A Babatunde; O A Atoyebi; K A Durowade; L O Omokanye
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Changing work stressors and coping resources influence blood pressure and hypertension incidence in a large OHSPIW cohort.

Authors:  Y Lian; C Qi; N Tao; R Han; Y Jiang; S Guan; H Ge; L Ning; J Xiao; J Liu
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Effects of job strain on blood pressure: a prospective study of male and female white-collar workers.

Authors:  Chantal Guimont; Chantal Brisson; Gilles R Dagenais; Alain Milot; Michel Vézina; Benoît Mâsse; Jocelyne Moisan; Nathalie Laflamme; Caty Blanchette
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Chronic psychosocial stress and hypertension.

Authors:  Tanya M Spruill
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Labile and Paroxysmal Hypertension: Common Clinical Dilemmas in Need of Treatment Studies.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and ambulatory blood pressure: results of a cross-sectional study in call handler operators.

Authors:  Giovanni Maina; Massimo Bovenzi; Antonio Palmas; Andrea Prodi; Francesca Larese Filon
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Paul A Landsbergis; Marnie Dobson; George Koutsouras; Peter Schnall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Occupational status moderates the association between current perceived stress and high blood pressure: evidence from the IPC cohort study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Wiernik; Bruno Pannier; Sébastien Czernichow; Hermann Nabi; Olivier Hanon; Tabassome Simon; Jean-Marc Simon; Frédérique Thomas; Kathy Bean; Silla M Consoli; Nicolas Danchin; Cédric Lemogne
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  The clinical spectrum of labile hypertension: a management dilemma.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Psychosomatic research in hypertension: the lack of impact of decades of research and new directions to consider.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.