Literature DB >> 14597591

Hospitalization costs of primary stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: cost analysis of the Canadian STAT Study.

Michel R Le May1, Richard F Davies, Marino Labinaz, Heather Sherrard, Jean-François Marquis, Louise A Laramée, Edward R O'Brien, William L Williams, Rob S Beanlands, Graham Nichol, Lyall A Higginson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously showed that primary stenting was more effective than accelerated tPA in reducing the 6-month composite of death, reinfarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization for ischemia. This study looks at the hospitalization costs of primary stenting compared with accelerated tPA. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Initial and 6-month hospitalization costs were computed for all patients randomly assigned to primary stenting (n=62) or accelerated tPA (n=61) in the Stenting versus Thrombolysis in Acute myocardial infarction Trial (STAT). Costs and resource usage were collected in detail for each patient. Physician fees were obtained directly from billings to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. The length of initial hospitalization was 6.7+/-11.3 days in the stent group and 8.7+/-6.7 days in the tPA group (P<0.001). Total hospitalization days at 6 months were 8.3+/-13 days in the stent group and 12.1+/-14.0 days in the tPA group (P=0.001). Hospitalization costs were less in the stent group for the initial hospitalization, 6354 dollars +/-6382 versus 7893 dollars +/-4429 (P=0.001), and at 6 months, 7100 dollars +/-7111 versus 9559 dollars +/-6933 (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In centers in which facilities and experienced interventionists are available, primary stenting is less costly and more effective than thrombolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597591     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000097120.26062.FE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

1.  Can the published cost analysis data for delivery of an efficient primary angioplasty service be applied to the modern National Health Service?

Authors:  N Melikian; K Morgan; K J Beatt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Reducing mortality in myocardial infarction: goal should be interhospital transfer for primary angioplasty.

Authors:  Mario Ivanusa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-28

Review 3.  Delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario Consensus Report.

Authors:  Marino Labinaz; Terri Swabey; Randal Watson; Madhu Natarajan; Wendy Fucile; Bruce Lubelsky; Bruce Sawadsky; Eric Cohen; Kevin Glasgow
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Code STEMI: implementation of a city-wide program for rapid assessment and management of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michel Le May
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Safety of returning patients immediately to their originating hospitals after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Rahim Gul; Maksymilian P Opolski; Mufti Akif; Mehboob Ali Dar; Yasir Beshir; Haitham Sakr; Hassan Khalaf; Akram Eldesoky; Osama A Smettei; Tariq I Soomro; Mohammed Saied; Asim Ganawa; Rami M Abazid
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-17

6.  Primary Angioplasty for the Treatment of Acute ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-08-01

Review 7.  Acute ischemic heart disease and interventional cardiology: a time for pause.

Authors:  Peter Bogaty; James M Brophy
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 8.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.