Literature DB >> 14597451

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a viable operative alternative in selected patients with rectal lesions.

P Neary1, G B Makin, T J White, E White, J Hartley, A MacDonald, P W R Lee, J R T Monson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Local excision of rectal lesions is being increasingly undertaken, especially in those unfit for major surgery. The traditional transanal approach is often cumbersome and limited to low and mid rectal lesions. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is being used to excise both benign and malignant rectal lesions, including those in the upper rectum.
METHODS: Prospective analysis of all patients undergoing a TEMS excision between January 1997 and December 2000 in a specialized colorectal unit.
RESULTS: Forty patients underwent a TEMS resection, with a mean age of 72 years (SD, 10 years). The mean distance of the lesions from the anal verge was 9.8 cm (SD, 3.1 cm). In 24 patients, the lesion was located >or=10 cm from the anal verge, making them unsuitable for traditional transanal resection. The mean operative time was 91 minutes (SD, 34 minutes), and the mean postoperative stay was 3 days (SD, 1.5 days). No mortality was associated with the procedure, and there was minimal morbidity in 15%. There has been no recurrence in the 18 patients who had a malignant lesion excised.
CONCLUSIONS: The TEMS operating system provides the surgeon with a suitable alternative for the resection of benign and malignant rectal neoplasms in selected patients. It has the advantage of providing visual clarity of the operative field, allowing more precise dissection and a minimally invasive approach to mid and upper rectal lesions. There has been no mortality and minimal morbidity. We advocate its inclusion as part of a colorectal surgeon's operative armamentarium for these selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597451     DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.01.441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  30 in total

1.  Robotic TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  S B Atallah; M R Albert; T H deBeche-Adams; S W Larach
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Multidisciplinary management in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Asunción Hervás Morón; María Luisa García de Paredes; Eduardo Lobo Martínez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art.

Authors:  D S Keller; E M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward.

Authors:  Sam Atallah; Matthew Albert; Sergio Larach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  S Maslekar; S H Pillinger; J R T Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Yutaka Saito; Taku Sakamoto; Nozomu Kobayashi; Naoto Sakamoto; Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Keiko Niimi; Tomohiko Ohya; Ken Ohata; Shinichi Okamura; Shinei Iizuka; Yoji Takeuchi; Noriya Uedo; Pietro Fusaroli; Marco Augusto Bonino; Mauro Verra; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G B Makin; D J Breen; J R Monson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Surgical resection of rectal adenoma: a rapid review.

Authors:  Damian Casadesus
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Transanal endoscopic operation for rectal lesions using two-dimensional visualization and standard endoscopic instruments: a prospective cohort study and comparison with the literature.

Authors:  D H Nieuwenhuis; W A Draaisma; G H M Verberne; A J van Overbeeke; E C J Consten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel C Damin; Anderson R Lazzaron
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.